Annuls Article 3 of Decision C(2007) 4441 final in so far as it requires Galp Energía España, Petróleos de Portugal (Petrogal) and Galp Energia, SGPS to bring to an end the infringement as found in Article 1 of that decision and to refrain from repeating any act or conduct described in that article or having the same or similar object or effect, to the extent that that infringement includes (i) the system for monitoring the implementation of the market-sharing and customer-allocation arrangements and (ii) the compensation mechanism to correct deviations from the market-sharing and customer-allocation arrangements;

As regards master-feeder structures, the Commission should be empowered to adopt measures designed to specify the content of the agreement between master and feeder UCITS or of the internal conduct of business rules, the content of the information-sharing agreement between either their depositaries or their auditors, the definition of measures appropriate to coordinate the timing of their net asset value calculation and publication in order to avoid market timing, the impact of the merger of the master on the authorisation of the feeder, the type of irregularities originating from the master to be reported to the feeder, the format and t ...[+++]he way to provide information to unit-holders in case of conversion from a UCITS to a feeder UCITS, the procedure for valuing and auditing the transfer of assets from a feeder to a master, and the role of the depositary of the feeder in this process.

an overview of data sharing arrangements that have been, or are being, created between public authorities and Community institutions and bodies, including examples of data sharing arrangements for a particular spatial data set.

(b)an overview of data sharing arrangements that have been, or are being, created between public authorities and Community institutions and bodies, including examples of data sharing arrangements for a particular spatial data set.

The extension of discussions from attempts to create a common price list to a 'more structured attempt at market-sharing` from June 1993 resulted from a realisation that attempts to raise prices without a market-sharing or quota agreement would always fail (ABB's Article 11 Reply, p. 35).

In any event, the Danish and German markets were being discussed in the same forum; the regular meetings leading to the market-sharing agreement in Germany in the summer of 1993 ensured the continuity of the collusion between the six major producers.