To set up an additional registry system that would in theory require a police officer to look at the CPIC system and then to check an additional system does not make a great deal of sense on the face of it.

Looking to the future, the report calls for, among other things: further improvements to the quality of the Register's content; strict enforcement of the rules; expansion of the number of registrations through further external information and communication efforts; active use of the scheme by staff and Members in both institutions by providing them with guidelines on the Register; encouragement for other EU bodies, organs and agencies to use it; and further clarifications and guidelines for registrants on how to provide the necessary information.

(Return tabled) Question No. 231 Hon. Carolyn Bennett: With regard to the Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act (Statutes of Canada 2010, Chapter 18) (Bill C-3, 40th Parliament, Third Session): (a) how many individuals have applied for Indian Status specifically as a result of the passage of Bill C-3, and how many of these applicants have been deemed (i) eligible for registration, (ii) ineligible for registration, (iii) are awaiting a ruling by the Indian Registrar as to their eligibility for Indian status under the legislation; (b) how many additional employees have been hired by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Dev ...[+++]elopment to expedite the processing of applications made as a result of the passage of Bill C-3; (c) what has been the average time required to complete the processing of applications made as a result of the passage of Bill C-3; (d) how does the number of applications received compare to the department’s estimate that 45,000 individuals would be added to the Indian Register as a result of Bill C-3; (e) since January 31, 2011, has the department revised or considered revising its estimates about the number of Bill C-3 registrants; (f) what is the breakdown by First Nation of newly eligible Bill C-3 registrants; (g) what were the conclusions and recommendations of the Internal Financial Impacts Working Group established in March 2010 to determine the cost implications of adding approximately 45,000 individuals to the Indian Register; (h) what is the department’s response to the report of the Internal Financial Impacts Working Group; and (i) has the department committed, or does it plan to commit, any additional resources to program spending or contributions and grants to First Nation governments due to the addition of new individuals to the Indian Register?

11. If the complaint is upheld, the registrant concerned shall be temporarily suspended from the register pending the taking of steps to address the issue (see Stage 4 below) and may be subject to a number of additional measures including removal from the register and withdrawal, where applicable, of any authorisation for access to the European Parliament's premises in accordance with the internal procedures of that institution (see Stage 5 and rows 2-4 in the table of measures below), notably in cases of non-cooperation.

The first place to start with the patent register is primarily tied, from a listing point of view, with the first two types of drug submissions: the new drug submission and the supplemental new drug submission.

So why create another registry?