The application is part of the Commission’s "Your Passenger Rights at Hand" campaign.

3. This Decision is without prejudice to the right of Member States to allow the use of the frequency bands under less restrictive conditions or for short-range devices which are not part of the harmonised category provided that this does not prevent or reduce the possibility for short-range devices of such a category to rely on the appropriate set of harmonised technical and operational conditions, as specified in the Annex to this Decision, which allow the shared use of a specific part of the spectrum on a non-exclusive basis and for different purposes by short range devices of the same category’.

This Supplementary Protocol shall not affect the rights and obligations of States under the rules of general international law with respect to the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts.

At this point in time, there is no integrated marine cadastre to demonstrate the spatial interrelationship between these existing rights, and there's an increasing potential for environmental disasters, litigation, and serious accidents in the offshore.

Preliminary ruling · Corte d'Appello di Torino (Court of Appeal, Turin), Italy · Interpretation of Article 27(1) of the Brussels Convention · Judgment, recognition of which is contrary to public policy in the State in which recognition is sought · Inclusion in the public policy of a Member State of rules of Community law · Scope of Articles 30 to 36 of the EC Treaty and/or Article 86 of the EC Treaty · Conflict between the intellectual property rights of a car manufacturer in the whole or component parts of a car's bodywork and the rights of a manufacturer of spare parts

On the first point, Ms. Beckton acknowledged that there is concern about “the potential for legislation to have unanticipated impacts on Aboriginal and treaty rights because there is no process for parliamentarians to assess specifically how legislation may affect these rights”.[72] On the second, Charles Pryce, Senior Counsel in the Department of Justice’s Aboriginal Law and Strategic Policy Directorate, underscored the point that “at this stage in the development of law, . the scope of Aboriginal rights, and even treaty rights, particularly historical treaty rights, is unclear.