incurred but not reported claim [ IBNR claim | incurred but not reported loss | unreported claim | unreported loss ]

incurred but not reported claims | IBNR | incurred but not reported losses

incurred but unreported claims reserve

incurred but not reported | IBNR [Abbr.]

incurred but not reported claims

claim in course of settlement

(b) if the amount or value of the penalty or forfeiture does not exceed ten thousand dollars, and the term of imprisonment does not exceed twelve months, exclusive of any term of imprisonment that may be adjudged or ordered for non-payment of any pecuniary penalty, whether or not the offence in respect of which it has been incurred is declared by this Act to be an indictable offence, by summary conviction before a provincial court judge, or any two justices of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where the cause of prosecution a ...[+++]rises, or wherein the defendant is served with process, or before any functionary, tribunal or person empowered by the proper legislative authority to perform acts usually required to be done by two or more justices of the peace and acting within the local limits of his or its jurisdiction.

(b) if the amount or value of the penalty or forfeiture does not exceed ten thousand dollars, and the term of imprisonment does not exceed twelve months, exclusive of any term of imprisonment that may be adjudged or ordered for non-payment of any pecuniary penalty, whether or not the offence in respect of which it has been incurred is declared by this Act to be an indictable offence, by summary conviction before a provincial court judge, or any two justices of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where the cause of prosecution a ...[+++]rises, or wherein the defendant is served with process, or before any functionary, tribunal or person empowered by the proper legislative authority to perform acts usually required to be done by two or more justices of the peace and acting within the local limits of his or its jurisdiction.

Both of them expressed unequivocal support for Mr. Justice Binnie's conclusions”, is “several” used to mean “more than two but not many” as defined by the Canadian Oxford Dictionary (2 ed) and (i) if so, who other than Justice Charron and Prof. Hogg is included in the class of “eminently qualified individuals” who reviewed this opinion, (ii) if not, in what sense was the word " several" used in this context and to convey what; (hh) was Justice Binnie informed that his opinion would be made public and, if so, was this part of the arrangement the government made with him; (ii) can Justice Charron publicly release her opinion that was re ...[+++]ndered to the government and, if not, why not; (jj) can Professor Hogg publicly release his opinion that was rendered to the government and, if not, why not; (kk) will the government release the opinions of Justice Charron and Prof. Hogg and, if not, why not; (ll) how did the government decide from whom to seek opinions; (mm) how did the government determine whose opinions to release; (nn) other than the Minister of Justice, who in the Department of Justice, in the Prime Minister's Office, and in the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada reviewed the Charron and Hogg opinions; (oo) where are the Charron and Hogg opinions currently stored, who has access to them, and what is the plan for retention; (pp) concerning the Selection Panel that considered Justice Marc Nadon’s candidacy, (i) how were members of the Panel chosen, (ii) what qualifications were sought, (iii) how did each of the members of the Panel meet the qualifications in (ii), (iv) what measures are in place to ensure that Aboriginal candidates are considered in the work of the Panel; (qq) who was the Executive Director of the SCC Selection Committee for this process and how was this person selected; (rr) what protections were in place to ensure that members of the Panel elevated mid-summer to Cabinet were not influenced by their ...

However, we can only regret that the proposals tabled by our Group were not adopted, specifically those arguing that interest representatives, in addition to being under an obligation to register, should also be obliged to disclose their expenditure on their activities, particularly by giving the same information on interest representation expenditure spent on Members of the European Parliament as the latter are obliged to disclose in their financial declarations.