(2) Despite subrule (1), where the parties expressly agree that applications to exclude evidence may be heard and determined by a judge other than the trial judge and that rulings made on these applications will be incorporated into the record of the proceedings in which the evidence is tendered for admission, the pre-trial conference or case management judge may make an order to give effect to the parties’ agreement and the applications may be heard and determined by a judge other than the designated trial judge.

Even if claims directed against a decision of the Appeals Committee of the European Investment Bank have the effect of bringing before the Union judicature an appraisal report against which an administrative appeal has been lodged, that fact is not, in itself, a reason for the Union court to confine itself to considering the claims against the contested report, or to omit entirely to review the validity of the Appeals Committee’s decision, in so far as the Committee has full power of review authorising it to substitute its assessments for those contained in the report, a power on which the Civil Service Tribunal, on the other hand, canno ...[+++]t rely.

SI || YES || 20.9.2013|| Act on International Co-operation in Criminal Matters between Member States of EU, published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no.48/20133 of 4th June 2013 || Before the decision on the investigation has been issued: public prosecutors; During the investigation: investigating judges; Within the trial stage: the trial judges.

Even if, in the event of a challenge to a decision of the appeals committee established by the EIB in connection with the appraisal of its staff, the assessment report as well as the decision itself, automatically came before the Courts of the Union, that, taken alone, would not justify those Courts in limiting their consideration to the objections made to the report, and certainly not in failing entirely to exercise their power to review the merits of the Appeal Committee’s decision, insofar as the committee has a full power of review entitling it to substitute its own assessments for those contained in the report, a power which the Civ ...[+++]il Service Tribunal does not enjoy.

Where the Court sits without the Registrar being present it shall, if necessary, instruct the most junior Judge for the purposes of Article 7 of these Rules to draw up minutes, which shall be signed by that Judge and by the President.

2. In the case of the examination of witnesses or experts, the minutes shall be signed by the President or by the Judge-Rapporteur responsible for conducting the examination of the witness or expert, and by the Registrar. Before the minutes are thus signed, the witness or expert must be given an opportunity to check the content of the minutes and to sign them.