postal claimant

deal with client's negative feedback | handle complaints by customers | handle customer complaints | handle customers' complaints

Claims Officer [ Claims Offr | Assistant Judge Advocate General Paralegal | AJAG Paralegal ]

mail service clerk | mail services counter clerk | counter clerk, post office | post office counter clerk

FE director | further education director | arts conservatory director | further education principal

Autopsy station

Postinfective vasculitis

Since, under the system laid down in the Staff Regulations, the person concerned must submit a complaint against the decision which he is contesting and then appeal against the decision rejecting his complaint, the EU judicature has held that the action is admissible whether it is directed against the initial decision alone, the decision rejecting the complaint or both, provided that the complaint and the appeal were lodged within the periods prescribed by Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations.

Consequently, the action before the judicature, even if formally directed against the rejection of the complaint, has the effect of bringing before the judicature the act adversely affecting the applicant against which the complaint was submitted, except where the scope of the rejection of the complaint differs from that of the measure against which that complaint was made.

procedures for handling complaints (both those made within the partnership and those from external parties relating to its work) and resolving conflict between partners;

under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof, in which BN seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 20 March 2012 terminating his duties as advisor to the Director of the Resources Directorate of the Directorate-General (DG) for Personnel, and reassigning him, from 15 March 2012, to a post as advisor in the ‘Eco-Management and Audit Scheme’ Service of the General Coordination Unit of the Resources Directorate of the DG for Infrastructure and Logistics (‘the EMAS Service’), and of the decision of 21 September 2012 rejecting his complaint against the decision of 20 March ...[+++] 2012, and, secondly, compensation for the harm suffered as a result of harassment and maladministration by his superiors, assessed on an equitable basis at EUR 400 000.