(3) The material on the appeal in writing shall be considered by a judge in chambers who may give directions as to whether the respondent should be requested to serve and file written argument and prescribe the times for doing so as well as for the service and filing of any reply in writing by the appellant.

(3) The material on the appeal in writing shall be considered by a judge in chambers who may give directions as to whether the respondent should be requested to serve and file written argument and prescribe the times for doing so as well as for the service and filing of any reply in writing by the appellant.

14. No factum is required from a self-represented person, but that person may, at any time before the hearing of the appeal, file a written argument setting out the reasons why the decision appealed from should be set aside.

The Tribunal finds, lastly, that, even though the applicant does not put forward any argument or plea in support of the requests forming the subject-matter of the first part of the note of 28 July 2009, the fact remains that it may be inferred from the actual wording of the note of 28 July 2009 that the applicant was complaining that she had not received the documents she had asked for several times, inter alia in her e-mail of 14 May 2009, concerning written test (b), and ...[+++] in her e-mail of 4 July 2009 and her request for review of 10 July 2009, concerning written test (c).

Further, where the law of a third country requires that certain financial instruments be held in custody by a local entity and there are no local entities that satisfy all depositary delegation requirements, the depositary should be able to discharge itself of liability provided that: the rules or instruments of incorporation of the AIF concerned expressly allow for such a discharge; the investors have been duly informed of that discharge and the circumstances justifying the discharge prior to their investment; the AIF or the AIFM on behalf of the AIF instructed the depositary to delegate the custody of such financial instruments to a ...[+++]local entity; there is a written contract between the depositary and the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF, which expressly allows such a discharge; and there is a written contract between the depositary and the third party which expressly transfers the liability of the depositary to that third party and makes it possible for the AIF, or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF, to make a claim against the third party in respect of the loss of financial instruments or for the depositary to make such a claim on their behalf.

(b)a written contract between the depositary and the third party expressly transfers the liability of the depositary to that third party and makes it possible for the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF to make a claim against the third party in respect of the loss of financial instruments or for the depositary to make such a claim on their behalf; and