direct field | direct sound field

direct planting in the field

Advisory Committee on the Implementation of Directive 89/105/EEC relating to the Transparency of Measures Regulating the Pricing of Medicinal Products for Human Use and their Inclusion in the Scope of National Health Insurance Systems

scanning near-field optical microscopy | SNOM | near-field scanning optical microscopy | NSOM | near-field optical microscopy

oilfield construction [ oil field construction | oil-field construction ]

scanning near-field optical microscope | SNOM | near-field scanning optical microscope | NSOM | near-field optical microscope

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

A second series of amendments seeks to clarify the scope of the Directive by specifying: the persons to whom it applies (the Directive must also apply to legal persons – as criminal proceedings conducted against legal persons must benefit from the same comprehensive approach as proceedings against physical persons – and to persons summoned or questioned as witnesses who become, or are liable to become, suspects during the course of questioning); when it applies (the Directive must apply from the time a person becomes a suspect or an accused person, at all stages in the proceedings and up until the final conclusion of those proceedings); ...[+++] and the cases to which it applies (the Directive must apply to proceedings in ‘criminal matters’ as defined in the ECHR).

As long as the provinces have not agreed to put their jurisdiction in abeyance, that is to have their own measures come under the treaty, and as long as there is no federal clause that goes beyond what they are normally, there will be no direct implication in areas of provincial jurisdiction, so that even in the current context, if the wording remained the same, the provincial measures that are within a very specific area of provincial responsibility would not be affected by the agreement, because the federal government has no constitutional jurisdiction to get involved in implementing international obligations in areas that are under ex ...[+++]clusive provincial jurisdiction.

They may not necessarily visit the field directly.

While some Member States have interpreted the scope of Directive 89/105/EEC restrictively, the Court of Justice ruled that those pricing and reimbursement procedures fall within the scope of Directive 89/105/EEC given the objectives of that Directive and the need to ensure its effectiveness.