chum salmon [ keta salmon | silverbright salmon | dog salmon | chum | keta | calico salmon | fall salmon ]

chum salmon | dog salmon | fall salmon

chum salmon | dog salmon | keta salmon

CP24 CHUM Christmas Wish [ CHUM Charitable Foundation | CHUM's Kid's Crusade Foundation ]

black salmon | chinook | chinook salmon | chub salmon | king salmon | Pacific salmon | quinnat | quinnat salmon | spring salmon | tyee

Indian-cure salmon [ Indian cure salmon | Indian style salmon | hard smoked salmon | Indian hard cured salmon | beleke ]

Calcitonin(salmon)

landlocked salmon | lake Atlantic salmon | ouananiche | sebago | sebago salmon

Salmon calcitonin

Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (O. kisutch), Masou salmon (O. masou), rainbow or steelhead trout (O. mykiss), sockeye salmon (O. nerka), pink salmon (O. rhodurus) chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha), and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

(c) fisheries in tidal waters in and adjacent to the Yukon Territory and fisheries in the Yukon Territory for fish of an anadromous stock of chum salmon, coho salmon, chinook salmon, pink salmon, sockeye salmon, rainbow trout, the family Coregonidae (whitefish and cisco) or Arctic char; and

I don't know whether you've had the opportunity to come and fish in that period of time, but beautiful silver, robust Pacific salmon come in, and it's not uncommon to see 40, 50, or 80 lice per pink salmon or chum salmon.

[Text] Question No. 97— Mr. Peter Stoffer: In regard to the Tulsequah Chief Mine project: (a) which of the seventy stream crossings, sixty-four culverts and seven bridges to be undertaken in association with the proposed project pose the highest risks to the spawning or rearing habitats of the chinook, sockeye, coho, pink, chum salmon, and to the water quality in the area; (b) which of the proposed undertakings pose the greatest risk to other fish species in the area such as Dolly Varden char and whitefish, and cutthroat, bull and steelhead trout; (c) what are the estimated costs to pump back and treat the metals tailing seepage enteri ...[+++]ng the Shazah wetland as a result of the project operations; (d) what are the concerns of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans related to post-closure issues and road issues including fish passage at crossings, sediment release from the road, the status of roads post-closure, habitat displacement at causeways, and the geotechnical stability of the road; (e) does the government acknowledge and support requests from the community, fishermen associations, NGOs, and the State of Alaska for the project to be referred to the Pacific Salmon Commission for study and recommendations, and if not, why not; (f) will government approval for the project constitute a breach of the “safe passage” provision in the Pacific Salmon Treaty, and if not, why not; (g) what is the government's methodology for the calculation of reclamation bonding to limit taxpayer liability given the mine's remote location and acid mine drainage risks to critical fish habitat; and (h) why has the site never been reclaimed and acid drainage from the mine, identified by Environment Canada in 1995 as acutely toxic to fish, been allowed to continue to flow into the Tulsequah River?