4. Regrets the deficiencies in staff selection procedures which put at risk the transparency of these procedures; acknowledges, in fact, that the Court of Auditors reported that with regard to the four staff selection procedures audited, no evidence existed that the weightings of the selection criteria and the thresholds that candidates had to meet in order to be invited to the written tests and interviews were established before the evaluation process began and no evidence existed that the questions for the written tests and interviews were defined prior to drawing up the shortlist of candidates; calls therefore on the Authority to re ...[+++]medy the situation by improving its selection procedures;

4. Regrets the deficiencies in staff selection procedures which put at risk the transparency of these procedures; acknowledges, in fact, that the Court of Auditors reported that with regard to the four staff selection procedures audited, no evidence existed that the weightings of the selection criteria and the thresholds that candidates had to meet in order to be invited to the written tests and interviews were established before the evaluation process began and no evidence existed that the questions for the written tests and interviews were defined prior to drawing up the shortlist of candidates; calls therefore on the Authority to re ...[+++]medy the situation by improving its selection procedures;

6. Reiterates the importance of enhancing interinstitutional cooperation in the field of building policy; calls on the other EU institutions likewise to develop medium- and long-term buildings strategies that include the objectives set out in this resolution; stresses the need to receive in good time the information necessary for decision-making under the procedure laid down in Article 179 of the Financial Regulation, which ‘should include needs assessments and cost benefit analyses for the various alternatives, outlining the options to rent or buy, as well as transparent information concerning the alternative financing possibilities, the long-term financial consequences, and compatibility with the MFF’ (Annex 2 to EP resolution of 17 Dec ...[+++]ember 2009 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010 as modified by the Council); takes the view that, in this context, cooperation with other institutions in working towards the harmonisation of such information in order to allow a comparison of building space and costs should be considered a key issue; points to the need for a specific report and possible recommendations concerning unnecessarily high maintenance, renovation and purchase costs;

2. Within a period of three years from the adoption by the Commission of the system of certification of maintenance referred to in Article 14a(5) of the Railway Safety Directive, the Agency shall send to the Commission a report evaluating the implementation of such system.

This annex indicates the assessment of conformity of that part of the maintenance subsystem dealing with fixed installations relating to train servicing.

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 32008R0692 - EN - Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (Text with EEA relevance) - COMMISSION REGULATION - (EC) No 692/2008 // of 18 July 2008 // implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to ve ...[+++]hicle repair and maintenance information // ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS FOR EC TYPE-APPROVAL // Appendix 1 // Verification of conformity of production — First statistical method // Appendix 2 // Verification of conformity of production — Second statistical method // Appendix 3 // MODEL // INFORMATION DOCUMENT No . // Appendix to information document // INFORMATION ON TEST CONDITIONS // Appendix 4 // MODEL OF EC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE // (Maximum format: A4 (210 × 297 mm)) // Addendum to EC type-approval certificate No . // concerning the type-approval of a vehicle with regard to emissions and access to vehicle repair and maintenance information according to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 // Appendix 5 // Vehicle OBD information // Appendix 6 // EC Type –Approval Certification Numbering System // Appendix 7 // IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY // IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY CHECK // STATISTICAL PROCEDURE FOR IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY TESTING // RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY // VERIFYING AVERAGE EXHAUST EMISSIONS AT AMBIENT CONDITIONS // (TYPE 1 TEST) // EMISSIONS DATA REQUIRED AT TYPE-APPROVAL FOR ROADWORTHINESS PURPOSES // MEASURING CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSION AT IDLING SPEEDS // (TYPE 2 TEST) // MEASUREMENT OF SMOKE OPACITY // VERIFYING EMISSI ...