In line with the recommendations made by the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (the ‘Article 29 Data Protection Working Party’) in its Working document on data protection and privacy implications in eCall initiative, adopted on 26 September 2006, when deploying the eCall PSAP infrastructure, Member States are to ensure that the processing of personal data in the context of handling eCalls fully complies with the personal data protection rules provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament an ...[+++]d of the Council

In line with the recommendations made by the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (the ‘Article 29 Data Protection Working Party’) in its Working document on data protection and privacy implications in eCall initiative, adopted on 26 September 2006, when deploying the eCall PSAP infrastructure, Member States are to ensure that the processing of personal data in the context of handling eCalls fully complies with the personal data protection rules provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) and in Directive 2002/58/EC of the ...[+++] European Parliament and of the Council (6).

Eurostat published the following advice in 2013: the accounting treatment of the Bank of England Asset Purchase Facility Fund (BEAPFF) and flows between the Bank of England and HM Treasury in the United Kingdom, the statistical treatment of a concession sale before privatisation in Portugal, the recapitalisation of the Dexia Group in Belgium, the classification of the Sociedad de activos de Restructuracion (SAREB) in Spain, the recording of financial corrections related to EU funds in accordance with Regulation 1083/2006 art 100(1) in ...[+++] Romania, the statistical treatment of the mobile phone spectrum 15 years concession in Hungary, the treatment of the LAK Invest Real estate transaction in the Flemish Region in Belgium, the recording of IABF Guarantee Fee in the Netherlands, the treatment of tax refunds, penalty payments and interim payments in the Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) tax case in the United Kingdom, the recording of cancellation of payables related to penalties and fines to be paid by CFR Cai Ferate to private energy suppliers in Romania and the statistical classification of MyCSP Ltd. in the United Kingdom.

Having consulted the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (2) (the Article 29 Working Party),

(13) According to the recommendations made by the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party and contained in the 'Working document on data protection and privacy implications in eCall initiative', adopted on 26 September 2006[9], any processing of personal data through the eCall in-vehicle system should comply with the personal data protection rules provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data[10] and in Directive 2002/58/EC of the European ...[+++]Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications)[11], in particular to guarantee that vehicles equipped with eCall in-vehicle systems, in their normal operational status related to 112 eCall, are not traceable and are not subject to any constant tracking and that the minimum set of data sent by the in-vehicle eCall system includes the minimum information required for the appropriate handling of emergency calls.

Applicants or drivers with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome under treatment shall be subject to a periodic medical review, at intervals not exceeding three years for drivers of group 1 and one year for drivers of group 2, with a view to establish the level of compliance with the treatment, the need for continuing the treatment and continued good vigilance.