discreet respondent | non respondent

pension plan sponsor [ sponsor of a pension plan | plan sponsor | sponsor of a plan | sponsor ]

Definition: Psychotic conditions meeting the general diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia but not conforming to any of the subtypes in F20.0-F20.2, or exhibiting the features of more than one of them without a clear predominance of a particular set of diagnostic characteristics. | Atypical schizophrenia

association responder in ROSE | association responding application entity

discrete cosine transform | DCT | discrete cosinus transform

Focus Groups with Respondents and Non-respondents to the Survey of Consumer Finances

soft sell | soft sales approach

Conditions meeting the above criteria but developing in the course of a dementia (F00-F03).

megaloblastic anaemia unresponsive to vitamin B12 or folate therapy

10. Deplores the absence in the above-mentioned new communication of any reference to EU Pilot, which is, as defined by the Commission itself, a ‘well-established working method’ which it uses to deal with complaints as a first step in the infringement procedure wherever there might be recourse to that procedure ; notes that EU Pilot is not even mentioned by name in the communication and that there is no reference to any of the rights or the protection accorded to the complainant under EU Pilot; concludes, therefore, that decisions taken by the Commission which precede or exclude the infringement procedure do not in these case obey the rules of transparency and accountability and are made at the Commission’s complete ...[+++]discretion alone;

10. Deplores the absence in the above-mentioned new communication of any reference to EU Pilot, which is, as defined by the Commission itself, a ‘well-established working method’ which it uses to deal with complaints as a first step in the infringement procedure wherever there might be recourse to that procedure; notes that EU Pilot is not even mentioned by name in the communication and that there is no reference to any of the rights or the protection accorded to the complainant under EU Pilot; concludes, therefore, that decisions taken by the Commission which precede or exclude the infringement procedure do not in these case obey the rules of transparency and accountability and are made at the Commission’s complete ...[+++]discretion alone;

All decisions taken by the Commission which proceed or exclude the infringement procedure are therefore not regulated in a transparent way, not accountable and at the complete discretion of the Commission.

I would like to respond to the member for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine by saying that, even when consecutive sentences are imposed, judges retain their discretion.