These measures include limiting the use of any sample obtained by police or probation officers to the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with the condition; allowing the offender to receive the results of an analysis of their sample; ensuring full notice from a probation officer in writing to the offender of any requirement to provide a sample at regular intervals, including where and when the sample is to be provided; requiring all jurisdictions to establish specific rules to be followed in the taking, testing, handling, storing and destruction of samples; requiring that all samples and records of analysis be destroyed once the pro ...[+++]hibition condition lapses, unless the analysis is to be used in a breach proceeding; and, finally, requiring that a sample demand can be made only when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a breach has occurred for probation orders and peace bonds.

2. Where the supervisory authority is of the opinion that the intended processing referred to in paragraph 1 would infringe this Regulation, in particular where the controller has insufficiently identified or mitigated the risk, the supervisory authority shall, within period of up to eight weeks of receipt of the request for consultation, provide written advice to the controller and, where applicable to the processor, and may use any of its powers referred to in Article 58.

5. Member States shall, where the supervisory authority is of the opinion that the intended processing referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article would infringe the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, in particular where the controller has insufficiently identified or mitigated the risk, provide for the supervisory authority to provide, within a period of up to six weeks of receipt of the request for consultation, written advice to the controller and, where applicable, to the processor, and may use any of its powers referred to in Article 47.

What I will be happy to do is get a written opinion from Justice—I'm sure I'll table it in this committee—that in fact the legislation as so structured ensures that the Official Languages Act will apply to the agency.

Senator Day: The question that was put to the honourable senator at second reading is that he provides this chamber with a copy of the written opinions of the Attorney General to his colleague, the minister.

Mr. Derek Lee (Scarborough-Rouge River, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I passed written notice to you that during question period at approximately 2:40 p.m., if my eyes did not deceive me and I do not have a videotape, it appeared to me that a stranger entered the House and spoke with the hon. member for Kamouraska-Rivière-du-Loup at his desk in the front row.