selected glazing quality | SQ [Abbr.]

dropping fraction

Definition: A group of disorders characterized by qualitative abnormalities in reciprocal social interactions and in patterns of communication, and by a restricted, stereotyped, repetitive repertoire of interests and activities. These qualitative abnormalities are a pervasive feature of the individual's functioning in all situations.

quality assurance | QA [Abbr.]

develop quality control framework | set quality control objectives | set QC objectives | set quality assurance objectives

Definition: A rare disorder in which the patient complains spontaneously that his or her mental activity, body, and surroundings are changed in their quality, so as to be unreal, remote, or automatized. Among the varied phenomena of the syndrome, patients complain most frequently of loss of emotions and feelings of estrangement or detachment from their thinking, their body, or the real world. In spite of the dramatic nature of the experience, the patient is aware of the unreality of the change. The sensorium is normal and the capacity for emotional expression intact. Depersonalization-derealization symptoms may occur as part of a diagnos ...[+++]able schizophrenic, depressive, phobic, or obsessive-compulsive disorder. In such cases the diagnosis should be that of the main disorder.

Quality of care or medical audit procedure, NOS

Qualitative platelet defects

It is prohibited to add qualifying adjectives such as ‘fine’ (‘fine’), ‘scelto’ (‘chosen’), ‘selezionato’ (‘selected’) or ‘superiore’ (‘superior’) to the ‘Garda’ protected designation of origin.

4.2. Adequacy of the quality of the options analysis to support the conclusion of the Member State that the main alternatives have been analysed and the best option was selected for implementation including justification of the option chosen.

—as appropriate, from a scientific perspective, establish positions on implementation and management of calls for proposals, evaluation criteria, peer review processes including the selection of experts, the methods for peer review and proposal evaluation and the necessary implementing rules and guidelines, on the basis of which the proposal to be funded will be determined under the supervision of the Scientific Council, and establish positions on any other matter affecting the achievements and impact of the ERC's activities and the quality of the research car ...[+++]ried out, including the principal provisions of the ERC Model Grant Agreement.

as appropriate, from a scientific perspective, establish positions on implementation and management of calls for proposals, evaluation criteria, peer review processes including the selection of experts, the methods for peer review and proposal evaluation and the necessary implementing rules and guidelines, on the basis of which the proposal to be funded will be determined under the supervision of the Scientific Council, and establish positions on any other matter affecting the achievements and impact of the ERC's activities and the quality of the research car ...[+++]ried out, including the principal provisions of the ERC Model Grant Agreement.