According to her, the aim of this regulation is to open the market to new fibres, to innovation, to a faster coding system, but hide the country of origin, because the Europe of fear, the Europe of concealment, the Europe of obfuscation, the Europe that does not say where things are produced, must rightly speed up the marketing of new fibres, but must not tell consumers where textile products are made.

Article 13(2) should be deleted to minimise the risk of inconsistency as the borderline between products for consumer and professional use is blurred, and as the exclusion would mean an unnecessary complication, lead to unclear procedures and responsibilities for the marketing of products.

Third, arising from that, instead of two factors in the equation (one very clear – Israel – the other, the Palestinians, a bit blurred), now we have three clearly defined factors – Gaza included – in an equation with a multiplication sign between its factors, meaning that if any one is zero, the product is zero.

27. Takes the view that the online environment and digital technology enable consumers to be offered a wide range of new products and services, and that intellectual property can be made compatible with consumers' expectations, but also considers that consumers' interests in relation to intellectual property rights are increasingly important, while their rights to enjoy digital works remain unclear and current trends in intellectual property, digital rights management and technological protection measures should adequately acknowledge consumer rights;

Aquaculture products (the legislative status of which has hitherto been rather vague) should be subject to the same controls as other products.