data group number

trunk group/member number

M.R. W. 112” on the southerly limit of the right-of-way of the transmission line from Yellowknife Hydro Development to Thompson-Lundmark Mine as same is shown on a plan of survey of said right-of-way approved by Frederic Hatheway Peters, Surveyor General of Dominion Lands on the twenty-first day of January, nineteen hundred and forty-two, of record number thirty-nine thousand eight hundred and thirty-six in the Legal Surveys Division of the Department of Mines and Resources, Ottawa; thence north eleven degrees and six minutes east a ...[+++]distance of seventy-five feet, more or less, to an iron pin planted on the northerly limit of said transmission line; thence north eleven degrees and thirty five minutes east a distance of one thousand four hundred and twelve feet, more or less, to an iron pin; thence north twenty five degrees and eleven minutes west a distance of one thousand four hundred and ninety-two feet, more less, to an iron pin planted on the southerly bank of Bluefish Lake; thence north fifty-five degrees and twelve minutes west a distance of one thousand eight hundred and fifty-three feet, more or less, to an iron pin; thence south fifty-two degrees and twenty four minutes west a distance of two hundred and sixty-nine feet, more or less, to an iron pin; thence south twelve degrees and twenty-four minutes east a distance of one thousand one hundred and forty-five feet, more less, to an iron pin; thence south twenty-three degrees and fifty-three minutes east a distance of two thousand four hundred and eighty-one feet, more or less, to post number four of the survey of lot one hundred and fifty-three, group nine hundred and sixty-four as said lot is shown on a plan of survey approved by said Frederic Hatheway Peters on the twenty-fourth day of October, nineteen hundred and forty-one, record number thirty-nine thousand eight hundred and two in said Legal Surveys Division; thence south no degrees six minutes and thirty seconds east along the westerly boundar ...

(Return tabled) Question No. 334 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to bijuralism and harmonization: (a) what measures are in place to ensure legislative bijuralism across all departments; (b) since the adoption of the “Policy on Legislative Bijuralism”, how has the Department of Justice (i) ensured that all legal counsel in the Department are made aware of the requirements of legislative bijuralism in order for them to be able to take it into account when advising client departments on legislative reforms, (ii) enhanced the capacity of the Legislative Services Branch to draft bijural legislative texts, (iii) undertook, in drafting both versions of every bill and proposed regulation that touches on provincial or territorial private law, to tak ...[+++]e care to reflect the terminology, concepts, notions and institutions of both of Canada’s private law systems; (c) since the adoption of the “Policy for Applying the Civil Code of Quebec to Federal Government Activities”, what measures are in place to ensure (i) changes to Quebec’s Civil Code are known and monitored by the government, (ii) assessment of federal legislation relative to changes to Quebec’s Civil Code, (iii) federal legislation is introduced to reflect, where necessary, changes to the Civil Code of Quebec; (d) with respect to the “Index of Bijuralism and Harmonization Caselaw” found online and indicating its most recent update was June 12, 2012, (i) how often is this page updated, (ii) given that some cases thereupon are from 2013, when was this page last updated, (iii) whose responsibility is it to update this page, (iv) what cases are currently being monitored for potential addition to this page; (e) with respect to cases involving bijuralism and harmonization, (i) in what ways are these made known to the Department, (ii) whose responsibility it is to monitor these cases, (iii), what role does the Federal government play in these cases if a party, (iv) what role does the government play if not a party, (v) who m ...

For platforms on upgraded lines in Great Britain where trains complying with the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI are intended to stop in normal commercial operation, the platform edge shall be the minimum distance from the adjacent track (within a tolerance of + 15, - 0 mm) consistent with the lower sector structure gauge set out in Appendix 1 to Railway Group Standard GC/RT5212 (Issue 1, February 2003).

For platforms on upgraded lines in Great Britain where trains complying with the High Speed Rolling Stock TSI are intended to stop in normal commercial operation, the platform edge shall be the minimum distance from the adjacent track (within a tolerance of + 15, - 0 mm) consistent with the lower sector structure gauge set out in Appendix 1 to Railway Group Standard GC/RT5212 (Issue 1, February 2003).