—as appropriate, from a scientific perspective, establish positions on implementation and management of calls for proposals, evaluation criteria, peer review processes including the selection of experts, the methods for peer review and proposal evaluation and the necessary implementing rules and guidelines, on the basis of which the proposal to be funded will be determined under the supervision of the Scientific Council, and establish positions on any other matter affecting the achievements and impact of the ERC's activities and the q ...[+++]uality of the research carried out, including the principal provisions of the ERC Model Grant Agreement.

as appropriate, from a scientific perspective, establish positions on implementation and management of calls for proposals, evaluation criteria, peer review processes including the selection of experts, the methods for peer review and proposal evaluation and the necessary implementing rules and guidelines, on the basis of which the proposal to be funded will be determined under the supervision of the Scientific Council; as well as any other matter affecting the achievements and impact of the ERC's activities, and the quality of the r ...[+++]esearch carried out, including the principal provisions of the ERC Model Grant Agreement;

policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments; Stresses that the main goal of the Innovation Union policy should be to facilitate coordination of policies and coherence among their different instruments and create synergies in regard to innovation policy by adopting a truly holistic approach focused on the grand societal challenges;

policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments; Stresses that the main goal of the Innovation Union policy should be to facilitate coordination of policies and coherence among their different instruments and create synergies in regard to innovation policy by adopting a truly holistic approach focused on the grand societal challenges;

§ policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments;

99. Recalls that the President of the Court of Auditors, in his speech to its competent committee in Strasbourg on 14 November 2005, said that the Court was "in the process of preparing a self-assessment of its organisation and methods to be followed by a peer review"; notes that no independent review of the Court's work has taken place since it was set up in 1977; welcomes the initiative and understands that the peer review will be an external review, as currently exercised in some Member States, and that the objective is to test the quality and relevance of what the Court ...[+++] is doing and clearly to indicate where the Court could learn from others, including both Member States and other states such as the United States and New Zealand;