square step

flyer [ flier | rectangular tread | rectangular stair tread ]

square emerald [ square emerald cut ]

Square potato chips

oblong can | rectangular can

square mesh panel | square mesh window | square-meshed panel

market [ market operation | market situation | market State | market structure ]

Assault with walking stick

Promotion of walking using mobility aid

TWO APPEALS against the judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2001 in Case T-128/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (square tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2785 and Case T-129/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (rectangular tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2793, seeking to have those judgments set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by D. Schennen and C. Røhl Søberg, acting as Agents,

By applications lodged at the Court Registry on 6 December 2001, Procter Gamble Company (‘Procter Gamble’) appealed pursuant to Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice against the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-128/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (Square tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2785 (‘Case T-128/00’) and Case T‑129/00 Procter Gamble v OHIM (Rectangular tablet with inlay) [2001] ECR II-2793 (‘Case T‑129/00’), (together hereinafter referred to as ‘the judgments under appeal’), by which the Court of First Instance partially dismissed its actions for annulment of the decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (‘OH ...[+++]IM’) of 8 March 2000 (Cases R‑506/1999‑1 and R‑508/1999‑1), which had rejected its appeals against the refusal to register as Community trade marks three-dimensional tablets for washing machines or dishwashers (‘the contested decisions’).

the markets for large square balers in Belgium and Luxembourg, Italy, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.