3. Acknowledges that, following the stress tests, countries have started to implement or plan measures to improve the safety of their plants, in particular in the light of the lessons learned from Fukushima; welcomes the fact that an action plan was agreed between ENSREG and the Commission for the follow-up of the recommendations and that all actions undertaken to improve nuclear safety will be shared at European level; highlights the fact that on the basis of peer review the Commission identified measures to be considered at EU level; calls on all actors involved to ensure an appropriate and immediate follow-up to all the findings an ...[+++]d recommendations contained therein, including identified best practice; recommends, with a view to this, confirming the leading role of ENSREG in monitoring the implementation of the peer-review recommendations on the basis of national action plans; asks for regular information from ENSREG on the progress made to be provided to the Commission, Parliament and the Council, and for Parliament to be informed and consulted annually regarding results, measures and plans in the area of nuclear safety;

The security plan should foresee one System Security Officer performing security-related tasks concerning both Central SIS II and the Communication Infrastructure and two Local Security Officers performing security-related tasks concerning the Central SIS II and the Communication Infrastructure, respectively.

Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Article 16 of Decision 2007/533/JHA provide that the Management Authority, in relation to Central SIS II, and the Commission, in relation to the Communication Infrastructure, should adopt the necessary measures, including a security plan.

As the Management Authority has not yet been established, the security plan to be adopted by the Commission should be applicable also to Central SIS II for a transitional period.

– (PL) Mr President, every plan should include decisions concerning its situation both in time and in space, but the present Commission decisions are slowing down implementation of earlier plans, for example, plans for cogeneration investments are being held back by the market, as it is not worth converting heat-generation plants into efficient heat and power plants burdened by emission charges and network problems.

28. Expresses concern at the build up of delays in implementing the Community Action Plan for the Reconstruction of Central America, and urges the Commission to provide the human resources required, with no further delay or reduction in the total agreed amount;