have been briefed and received written instructions on their responsibilities for protecting such information as well as on the means of ensuring such protection, and have signed a declaration acknowledging receipt of those instructions and undertaking to comply with them in accordance with the European Parliament’s security rules.

Question No. 111 Hon. Ralph Goodale: With regard to the Privy Council Office, and to the following documents: the Information to Obtain a Production Order and a Sealing Order, made on June 24th, 2013 by Corporal Greg Horton of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Ottawa, Ontario, before Chantal Dominique Marie Lurette, a Commissioner for the Taking of Oaths in the Province of Ontario, in which he states he has reasonable grounds to believe and does believe that offences contrary to an Act of Parliament have been made by Michael Duffy; the statements made in the Senate by Senator Michael Duffy on October 22, 2013, and statements made to the press on October 21, 2013 in Ottawa by Donald Bayne, a lawyer of that city acting on behalf of Senato ...[+++]r Duffy: (a) does the Access to Information Directorate of the Privy Council Office still conclude that no records exist with regard to Access to Information requests A-2013-00231, A-2013-00232, A-2013-00233, A-2013-00075, A-2013-00076, A-2013-00077, A-2013-00080, A-2013-00085, A-2013-00099, A-2013-00101, A-2013-00103, A-2013-00104, A-2013-00105, A-2013-00106, A-2013-00113, A-2013-00114, A-2013-00116, A-2013-00120, A-2013-00125, A-2013-00126, A-2013-00131, A-2013-00132, A-2013-00139, and A-2012-00751; (b) will the Directorate re-examine the handling of those requests in light of the new information outlined above; (c) did the Privy Council Office formerly hold records which would have satisfied one or more of those requests; (d) if so, were the records transferred, removed, or destroyed; (e) if transferred or removed, to whose custody or control were they transferred or removed; (f) if destroyed, when were they destroyed, on what date or dates was the destruction approved, and what is the file number of any order, instruction, directive, or authorization concerning their transfer, removal, or destruction?

Access to classified information shall be granted only if they have been briefed on, and received written instructions concerning, their responsibilities regarding the protection of such information, as well as the means of ensuring such protection, and if they have signed a declaration acknowledging receipt of those instructions and undertaking to comply with them in accordance with the current rules.

This comes under the principle that when you tell somebody to do something, if you're the CEO of a company and you even indirectly instruct somebody to commit a crime, that conduct, the statement that you made to them, is not protected speech if it's in the form of a direction in a hierarchical situation. Moreover, in the United States freedom of speech is an individual right.

The bill does not specify what will be contained in the ministerial instructions, but the Department indicates that these instructions could help identify individuals who may be vulnerable to human trafficking (12) The Department states that decisions will be made by immigration officials on a case-by-case basis, and that the instructions will be “based on clear evidence of risk, support the objectives of the Act, and conform with the Charter” (13) Elaborating on this point at second reading in the House of Commons, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration stated that such decisions “will be based on a n ...[+++]exus between the occupation that is proposed and the potential for abuse, the potential for degradation, and the potential for humiliating treatment.

The bill does not specify what will be contained in the ministerial instructions, but the Department indicates that these instructions could help identify individuals who may be vulnerable to human trafficking (8) The Department states that decisions will be made by immigration officials on a case-by-case basis, and that the instructions will be “based on clear evidence of risk, support the objectives of the Act, and conform with the Charter” (9) Elaborating on this point at second reading in the House of Commons, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration stated that such decisions “will be based on a nex ...[+++]us between the occupation that is proposed and the potential for abuse, the potential for degradation, and the potential for humiliating treatment.