Future Group | High-Level Advisory Group on the Future of European Home Affairs Policy

Future Group on Justice | High-Level Advisory Group on the Future of European Justice Policy

High-level Advisory Group on Administration Reform

Senior Advisory Group on Biotechnology

High-Level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing

High-Level Advisory Group | Mandelkern Group | Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation

Senior Defence Group on Proliferation | SDG

High-Level Group [ HLG ]

20. Proposes that the Commission establish this group as a high-level Better Regulation Advisory Body involving both stakeholder expertise and national experts as soon as possible; proposes a strong and independent advisory mandate for this body, which should complement the Commission’s work on IAs; believes that such a body’s expertise, including as regards subsidiarity and proportionality, could provide added value for the IA procedure and for other initiatives relating to better regulation; asks that Parliament and the Council be involved in the expert nomination proced ...[+++]ure; suggests that the best practices and experience of existing better regulation bodies (such as those in Sweden, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany) be taken into account;

21. Proposes that the Commission establish this group as a high-level Better Regulation Advisory Body involving both stakeholder expertise and national experts as soon as possible; proposes a strong and independent advisory mandate for this body, which should complement the Commission’s work on IAs; believes that such a body’s expertise, including as regards subsidiarity and proportionality, could provide added value for the IA procedure and for other initiatives relating to better regulation; asks that Parliament and the Council be involved in the expert nomination proced ...[+++]ure; suggests that the best practices and experience of existing better regulation bodies (such as those in Sweden, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany) be taken into account;

21. Proposes that the Commission establish this group as a high-level Better Regulation Advisory Body involving both stakeholder expertise and national experts as soon as possible; proposes a strong and independent advisory mandate for this body, which should complement the Commission’s work on IAs; believes that such a body’s expertise, including as regards subsidiarity and proportionality, could provide added value for the IA procedure and for other initiatives relating to better regulation; asks that Parliament and the Council be involved in the expert nomination proced ...[+++]ure; suggests that the best practices and experience of existing better regulation bodies (such as those in Sweden, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany) be taken into account;

7. Is firmly against the proposal of the High Level Group on Administrative Burdens to establish an external high level advisory body on better regulation outside the EU institutions, which would be responsible for assessing the administrative burden of proposals, the cost of compliance, respect for subsidiarity and proportionality, the choice of legal base, and suggesting better regulation initiatives and monitoring the implementation of EU legislation at national level; believes that this option raises serious issues of legitimacy ...[+++]and governance and would strongly undermine the role and legitimacy of the Commission; strongly insists that this responsibility for conducting comprehensive and balanced impact assessments should be retained by the Commission under the systematic control of the European Parliament;