want of prosecution

Criminal life style

Assault by criminal neglect

Assault by arson

criminal and penal prosecuting attorney | Crown prosecutor | Crown attorney | Attorney General's prosecutor

crime scene investigator [ CSI | crime scene technician | scenes of crime officer | scenes of crime examiner | crime scene examiner | forensic evidence technician | evidence technician | crime scene analyst | identification officer | ident officer | forensic identification technician ]

Is a national law compatible with the obligation of a Member State to provide for the effective prosecution of criminal offences by customs officials if that law provides for criminal proceedings brought against customs officials — for participation in a conspiracy to commit corruption offences while performing their professional duties (accepting bribes for non-performance of customs inspections), and for specific bribery offences and concealment of bribes received — to be terminated, without the court having examined the charges brought, under the following conditions: (a) two years have elapsed since the accused was charged; (b) the ...[+++]accused has lodged a request for the pre-trial investigation to be concluded; (c) the court has given the prosecutor a period of three months to conclude the pre-trial investigation; (d) during that period, the prosecutor has committed ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ (failure properly to notify a supplementary charge, failure to disclose the investigation file, contradictory indictment); (e) the court has given the prosecutor a further period of one month to remedy those ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’; ([f]) the prosecutor has failed to remedy the ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ within that time-limit — albeit that the infringements committed within the first three-month period and the failure to remedy them within the subsequent one-month period are attributable both to the prosecutor (failure to remove contradictions in the indictment; failure to take real action for most of those periods) and also to the defence (breach of the duty to cooperate with respect to notification of the charge and inspection of the investigation file due to the hospitalisation of the accused and claims regarding the lawyers’ other professional commitments); ([g]) the accused has acquired a subjective right to the termination of the criminal proceedings on account of the failure to reme ...

19. Underlines the fact that measures limiting fundamental rights on the internet for counterterrorism purposes must be necessary and proportionate, and in particular based on a proper definition of terrorism, which is currently lacking; stresses, furthermore, that the removal of criminal content should be carried out on the basis of judicial authorisation, and not through private policing by internet service providers, because if not, the tendency will be to extend blocking activities to a myriad of other forms of expression which have nothing at all to do with terrorism; points out that dictatorial regimes in third countries will cer ...[+++]tainly seek to copy the EU’s approach;

19. Stresses that measures limiting fundamental rights on the internet for counter-terrorism purposes need to be necessary and proportionate, in line with EU and Member State legislation, and in particular must be based on a proper definition of terrorism, which is currently lacking; emphasises, furthermore, that criminal content should be removed on the basis of judicial authorisation and not through private policing by internet service providers;

That has nothing to do with the operation of the permanent criminal court, except that if we fail to act and if other countries fail to act, there will be too many cases before the permanent criminal court.