Where the Commission finds, within six months after receiving the annual assessment report of the national supervisory authority concerned, that the assessment report does not establish that the variation of actual costs against determined costs is actually the result of relevant events or circumstances set out in paragraph 2(a) and in line with the provision of paragraph 2(b), it shall decide in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 that the Member State(s) concerned shall not be allowed to apply the provisions of paragraph 2 in respect to the variation of actual costs against determine ...[+++]d costs, in part or in whole according to its findings.

3. In order to allow reporting on the achievement of performance as established in Article 18(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, Member States shall make available to the Commission and Eurocontrol, by 1 June of each year, their actual costs incurred during the previous year and the difference between the actual costs and the determined costs contained in the performance plan by making use of the reporting tables and detailed rules set out in Annexes II, VI and VII. Those Member States that have decided that terminal air navigation services or CNS, MET and AIS services are subject to market conditions in accordance with Art ...[+++]icle 3 shall provide this information by making use of the reporting tables and detailed rules set out in Annex III.

Determined costs (performance plan) in real terms – actual/revised forecast costs at N-3 prices

Everyone essentially agrees to the principle of paying the true costs. Yet, when it comes to the specific measures to implement true costs, we hear a thousand excuses.

7 . If the insured person has actually borne all or part of the costs for the authorised medical treatment, and the costs which the competent institution is obliged to reimburse to the institution of the place of stay or to the insured person pursuant to paragraph 6 (actual cost) are lower than the costs which it would have had to assume for the same treatment in the competent Member State (notional cost), the competent institution shall reimburse, upon request, the cost of treatment incurred by the insured person up to the amount by which the notional cost exceeds the actual cost.

5. If the insured person has actually borne all or part of the costs for the authorised medical treatment him or herself and the amount of costs which the competent institution is obliged to reimburse to the institution of the place of stay or to the insured person according to paragraph 4a (actual cost) is lower than the amount of cost which it would have had to assume for the same treatment in the competent Member State (notional cost), the competent institution shall reimburse him/her, upon request, the cost of treatment incurred by the insured person up to the amount of the difference by which the notional cost exceeds the actual cos ...[+++]t.