‘Mark-up’ means the addition made to the incremental cost of a specific service in order to allocate and recover the common costs through allocation to all services for which those common costs are relevant.

The costs that are now being downloaded and attributed to our members, such as monitoring, electronic data-inputting, eco-labelling, traceability, catch certificates, and the MSC, will ultimately bankrupt our industry without proper focus, without proper implementation of such, and without a well-thought-out cost-recovery regime.

Where duly justified and accepted by the Commission, costs incurred in a force majeure situation may be considered as eligible direct costs and be recovered only within the limits foreseen for contingencies in the budget of the action’.

(48) As regards costs for the abandonment of the La Prohida subsector of the Sorriba Group, the information in the document from González y Díez S.A. coincides with that in the report by independent experts and is justified on the basis of the following indents of the Annex to Decision No 3632/93/ECSC: indent (f) for ventilation shafts, recovery of a crossing and future costs, also partly attributable to indents (l) and (g); indent (k) for the abandonment of the 1030 m at level 3 and the residual value of the remaining galleries of the La Prohida subsector; indents (f) and (g) for the restoration work at La Prohida.

The airport operator recovers the fixed cost of the service through a single airport charge to airlines for air traffic control and airport landing, consequently, it is not for NATS to fix these charges and there is no scope for discriminatory prices to be charged.

Charges for resource use and full-cost recovery for use of environmental infrastructures (such as water supply, wastewater treatment and sewage networks, and waste), should be an integral part of project financing.