Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade | TBT Committee

CTA's Accessibility Advisory Committee [ Accessibility Advisory Committee ]

Canadian Transportation Agency [ CTA | National Transportation Agency | National Transportation Agency of Canada | Canadian Transport Commission | Board of Transport Commissioners for Canada | Board of Railway Commissioners for Canada | Railway Committee of the Privy Council | Canadian Maritime Commission ]

Over the Counter Market (WallStreet) = OTC (1) | OTC (Wall Street) = Over the counter (2) | OTC = Over-The-Counter Market (3) | Over The Counter (stocks) (4) | over the counter (5) | over-the-counter (6) | OTC (7) | otc (8) | over the counter (9)

Orenda OTC 5 Gas Turbines and Switch Gear

otc

Ordinance of 29 June 1988 on the Promotion of Combined Transport and the Transport of Accompanied Motor Vehicles | Combined Transport Ordinance [ CombTransO ]

one time charge/initial charge | OTC/IC

One stop inclusive Tour Charter | OTC [Abbr.]

orthinine transcarbalymase | OTC [Abbr.]

R. whereas according to the 2014 US report on Technical Barriers to Trade, the US has raised concerns regarding REACH at every World Trade Organisation (WTO) TBT Committee meeting since 2003, intervening ‘with concerns that aspects of REACH are discriminatory, lack a legitimate rationale, and pose unnecessary obstacles to trade’, which indicates a rather fundamental opposition to REACH by the US;

X. whereas the 2014 US TBT report refers to the concerns of the US chemical and crop protection industry with regard to the hazard-based cut-off criteria to be developed for endocrine disrupters, and stated that the US raised concerns about DG Environment’s proposal bilaterally as well as during the meetings of the WTO TBT and SPS Committees; whereas the Commission decided to launch an impact assessment on the development of criteria for endocrine disrupters in July 2013; whereas this decision is the main reason for the Commission’s failure to adopt criteria by the 4-year deadline of December 2013; whereas, while the US welcomed the Commission’s decision, both the Counc ...[+++]il and Parliament decided to support Sweden in its court action to challenge the Commission’s failure, illustrating fundamentally different views as to the nature of regulatory provisions in EU law;

Mr. Joe Fontana: Mr. Chairman, in light of the fact that most of this information is deposited somewhere—I heard Statistics Canada or CTA is gathering all of this information.Rather than putting it into legislative form or regulatory form, perhaps what we might do as a committee is have, as an attachment to the bill, a special note to the minister and/or the CTA that on basic fares—and we'll have to determine whether or not we pick 20 or 30 or 40 pairings—within six months from the passing of the bill, that the CTA, and correct me if ...[+++]that's not the proper authority, provide that information to this committee; and that this committee will undertake in six months a study strictly on pricing and fares, with that information that's going to be provided for us, so that it will be the accountable or transparent or public forum by which we ourselves can be satisfied that there haven't been any undue price increases by virtue of a monopoly and/or dominant carrier or so on.

Key issues include: (i) fully implement Basel II and III along the agreed time-lines; (ii) implement the BCBS framework for Systemically Important Banks and extend the framework to encompass all SIFIs; (iii) agree on recommenda-tions to strengthen oversight, supervision and regulation of shadow banking sys-tem; (iv) full and consistent implementation of OTC derivative recommenda-tions.