direct costing | marginal costing | proportional costing(USA) | variable costing

estimate required supplies' costs | estimate required supply costs | estimate costs of required supplies | provide costs and proposed sale prices

domain calculus | domain oriented calculus | domain relational calculus

engineered cost [ engineered variable cost ]

contribution income statement [ contribution margin income statement ]

contribution margin [ contribution | marginal income ]

compute cost of covering | work out cost of covering | calculate cost of covering | calculate the cost of a covering

analyse costs of animal embryo transfer | identify the cost of transferring animal embryos | calculate costs for animal embryo transfer | determine the costs of transferring animal embryos

all annual charges and other payments taken from the product over a defined period, including any variable charges (such as transaction costs, stock exchange taxes), which cannot be included in the calculations of costs.

Save in cases covered by point 40, in those Member States, where, at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation, monthly rental prices for the full unbundled copper local loop fall outside the price band, NRAs should calculate costs and resulting access prices on the basis of the recommended costing methodology as soon as possible and notify the corresponding draft measure in accordance with the consultation procedure in Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC in due time, to ensure full implementation of the recommended costing methodology by 31 December 2016, bearing in ...[+++]mind the potential need for gradual price adjustments, in particular in those Member States where access prices are currently not cost oriented.

When imposing cost-oriented access prices, NRAs may continue to apply beyond 31 December 2016 the costing methodology that they use at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation, if it meets the objectives of the recommended costing methodology as set out in recitals 25 to 28 and satisfies the following criteria: (i) if not modelling an NGA network, it should reflect a gradual shift from a copper network to an NGA network; (ii) it should apply an asset valuation method that takes into account that certain civil infrastructure assets would not be replicated in the competitive process; (iii) it should be accompanied by documented projections of copper network prices showing that they will not fluctuate significantly and therefore wi ...[+++]ll remain stable over a long time period and that the alternative methodology meets the objective of regulatory transparency and predictability as well as the need to ensure price stability; and (iv) it should require only minimal modifications with respect to the costing methodology already in place in that Member State in order to meet the first three criteria.

When implementing the recommended costing methodology or alternative costing methodologies that comply with points 40 and 44, and the NRA maintains the methodology in line with point 46, NRAs should only update the data input into the costing methodology when conducting a new market review, in principle after three years.