pass the goods on for more detailed examination

(3) Despite subparagraphs (1)(a)(ii) and (iii), if the only activity relating to a project to be carried out outside the designated area is the transportation of persons or goods, the responsible Minister must send the project proposal to the Board to conduct the review unless that Minister determines that the transportation of persons or goods is a significant element of the project and that it is more appropriate for the review to be conducted by a federal environmental assessment panel or a joint panel, as the case may be, than by ...[+++]the Board and the Minister of the Environment agrees with that determination.

(3) Despite subparagraphs (1)(a)(ii) and (iii), if the only activity relating to a project to be carried out outside the designated area is the transportation of persons or goods, the responsible Minister must send the project proposal to the Board to conduct the review unless that Minister determines that the transportation of persons or goods is a significant element of the project and that it is more appropriate for the review to be conducted by a federal environmental assessment panel or a joint panel, as the case may be, than by ...[+++]the Board and the Minister of the Environment agrees with that determination.

(15) For further legal clarity and in order to protect the interests of legitimate traders from possible abuse of the border enforcement provisions, it is appropriate to modify the time limits for detaining goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right, the conditions in which information about consignments is to be passed on to right-holders by customs authorities, and the conditions for applying the procedure allowing for destruction of the goods under customs control for suspected infringements of intellectual property rights. other than for counterfeit and pirated goods and Where customs authorities take action followi ...[+++]ng the granting of an application, it is also appropriate to introduce a provision allowing the holder of the goods to express his/her views before the customs administration takes a decision which would adversely affect him/her suspends the release of or detains goods suspected of infringing intellectual property rights that are not counterfeit or pirated goods, as it may be difficult for customs authorities to determine upon mere visual examination whether an intellectual property right might be infringed .

We also found that the reason to refer individuals and shipments for further examination is not fully communicated to those officers doing the secondary examination, and results of the examination are not always documented.