Film Register Treaty | FRT [Abbr.]

Treaty on the International Registration of Audiovisual Works [ Film Register Treaty ]

line film

Exposed and Processed Film and Recorded Video Tape Remission Order [ Order Respecting the Remission of the Tax Imposed under Division III of Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, Paid or Payable on Exposed and Processed Film and Recorded Video Tape ]

The central administrator may establish a restricted communication link between the EUTL and the registry of a third country which signed a treaty concerning its accession to the Union for the purposes of enabling such registries to communicate with the ITL through the EUTL and to record verified emissions data of operators in the EUTL.

The central administrator and Member States shall ensure that the Union Registry and other KP registries store records concerning all relevant KP processes, log data and account holders of KP accounts for 15 years after the closure of the account or until any issue of implementation relating to them arising within the context of the UNFCCC bodies has been resolved, whichever is the later.

Regrets that little progress has been made to implement Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as regards the obligation for the institutions, agencies and other bodies to keep complete registers of documents, as provided for in its Articles 11 and 12 and, ultimately, in the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; calls for a common approach on registers to be established, and calls on those EU institutions that have not yet established registers of documents to do so, and to implement measures to standardise the classification and presentation of the institutions’ documents; reiterates, in this regard, further to a common access po ...[+++]int to EU documents through the three institutions’ portals, its call for common procedures and criteria for registration and the assignment of an interinstitutional code to each document so that, eventually, a common interinstitutional register, including a dedicated joint database on the state of play of legislative files, could be established.

In light of the difficult situation, the EP Members of the Working Group believe that a European Parliament position which examines the proposal for the review of the transparency register should not only confirm and renew its previous decisions calling for the introduction of a compulsory register, but also strongly formulate the expectation that the Commission should promote a political action aimed at the creation of a new legal basis, more appropriate than Article 352 TUE, for the introduction of a mandatory register.