It has to contain information as to the identity and nationality of the protected person; the use of any technological instruments provided to the protected person; particulars of the competent authority of the issuing State; the identification of the protection measure on the basis of which the EPO is adopted; a summary of the facts and circumstances which led to the imposition of the protection measure; the obligations or prohibitions imposed by the protection measure, their length and the express indication that their infringement constitutes a criminal offence under the law of the issuing State or may otherwise be punishable by a deprivation of liberty; the identification of the person causing a danger; any other circumstances th ...[+++]at could have an influence on the assessment of the danger, and, where appropriate, the express indication that a judgment, as defined by Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, or a decision on supervision measures, as defined by Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, has already been transferred to another Member State and the identification of the competent authority for the enforcement of such a judgment or decision.

2. In cases where contracting authorities or contracting entities within the meaning of Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/EC/18 and operators for the discharge of public service obligations under a public service contract within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 apply operational lifetime costs for energy consumption, CO2 emissions and pollutant emissions as award criteria for the procurement of road transport vehicles, they may apply the methodology set out in Article 3.

1. During the transitional period referred to in Article 10, but until 31 December 2010 at the latest, domestic and international bonds and other negotiable debt securities which have been first issued before 1 March 2001 or for which the original issuing prospectuses have been approved before that date by the competent authorities within the meaning of Council Directive 80/390/EEC or by the responsible authorities in third countries shall not be considered as debt claims within the meaning of Article 6(1)(a), provided that no further issues of such negotiable debt securities are made on or after 1 March 2002.

If a further issue is made on or after 1 March 2002 of an aforementioned negotiable debt security issued by a Government or a related entity acting as a public authority or whose role is recognised by an international treaty, as defined in the Annex, the entire issue of such security, consisting of the original issue and any further issue, shall be considered a debt claim within the meaning of Article 6(1)(a).

If a further issue is made on or after 1 March 2002 of an aforementioned negotiable debt security issued by a Government or a related entity, acting as a public authority or whose role is recognised by an international treaty, the entire issue of such security, consisting of the original issue and any further issue, shall be considered a debt-claim within the meaning of Article 6(1)(a).

If a further issue is made on or after 1 March 2002 of an aforementioned negotiable debt security issued by a Government or a related entity, the entire issue of such security, consisting of the original issue and any further issue, shall be considered a debt-claim within the meaning of Article 6 (1) (a).