3. Commercial documents and health certificates accompanying animal by-products or derived products during transport shall at least include information on the origin, the destination and the quantity of such products, and a description of the animal by-products or derived products and their marking, when such marking is required by this Regulation.

3. Commercial documents and health certificates accompanying animal by-products or derived products during transport shall at least include information on the origin, the destination and the quantity of such products, and a description of the animal by-products or derived products and their marking, when such marking is required by this Regulation.

An active substance, safener or synergist shall only be approved, if, on the basis of assessment of carcinogenicity testing carried out in accordance with the data requirements for the active substances, safener or synergist and other available data and information, including a review of the scientific literature, reviewed by the Authority, it is not or has not to be classified, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as carcinogen category 1A or 1B, unless the exposure of humans to that active substance, safener or synergist in a plant protection product, under realistic proposed conditions of use, is negligib ...[+++]le, that is, the product is used in closed systems or in other conditions excluding contact with humans and where residues of the active substance, safener or synergist concerned on food and feed do not exceed the default value set in accordance with Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.

We need to make a clear differentiation. If you make live animals a regulated product, by extension you're creating a whole different regulatory environment at the farm level.

They do not address the products with which they are fed. The feed regulations do not apply to feed for cervids that is, deer and elk and to date the agency has not been asked to include them in the definition of livestock under the Feeds Act (1220) [Translation] Having said that, I would like to mention that in December 2000, the Canadian Cervid Council inquired as to whether coverage of cervid species under the Act would enable farmers to avoid payment of GST on cervid feeds.

' SOR/2001-111 — REGULATIONS AMENDING THE MEAT INSPECTION REGULATIONS, 1990 Mr. Bernier: An amendment to these regulations made in 2001 required calves transported for slaughter to be transported in accordance with the provision of the recommended code of practice for the care and handling of farm animals, veal calves.