3. An alert may also be entered when the decision referred to in paragraph 1 is based on the fact that the third-country national has been subject to a measure involving expulsion, refusal of entry or removal which has not been rescinded or suspended, that includes or is accompanied by a prohibition on entry or, where applicable, a prohibition on residence, based on a failure to comply with national regulations on the entry or residence of third-country nationals.

Member States shall ensure that any subscriber has the possibility, using a simple means and free of charge, of stopping automatic call forwarding by a third party to the subscriber's terminal.

However, failed claimants who appeal to the Federal Court are granted an automatic stay of removal.15 An additional restriction on claimants from designated countries of origin was proposed in regulations after the BRRA received Royal Assent: they would not be granted an automatic stay of removal upon filing a leave to appeal application to the Federal Court.16 In background material on the changes introduced by Bill C-31, the government has indicated that it intends to reintroduce similar regulations, and to expand the exception to the automatic stay of removal to include claims found to have no credible basis, those from designated for ...[+++]eign nationals, and those made as exceptions to Safe Third Country Agreements.17

With exceptions and limitations, and in accordance with the regulations, individuals under an enforceable removal order or named in a security certificate could appeal to the Minister for protection (40) The exceptions would be people for whom the surrender decision had been made under the Extradition Act, those ineligible to have their refugee claims determined because they could be returned to a safe third country, those who had not left Canada since the application for protection was rejected and the prescribed period had not expired,(41) and those who had not left Canada since the removal order came into force and the prescribed peri ...[+++]od had not expired.

I will comment quickly on clause 278. What that does is make reference to a formula in the Canada Pension Plan Act, which requires that no provision comes into force with respect to the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act unless — and there is a formula which states — at least two thirds of the provinces representing two thirds of the population of Canada pass an order-in-council or equivalent thereof, bringing that provision into force.

While the third party recordkeeping and the maintained detailed funds flow is a significant deterrent to any criminal trying to deposit criminal funds via an ATM, the industry embraced the opportunity to join the Department of Finance task force and help to lead the development of new AML regulations for non-bank ABMs to further mitigate any risk of money laundering.