Speaker Lamoureux stated in a 1973 ruling that he had “no hesitation in reaffirming the principle that parliamentary privilege includes the right of a member to discharge his responsibilities as a member of the House free from threats or attempts at intimidation”.

DDU: Delivered Duty Unpaid (. named place of destination)

(Return tabled) Question No. 206 Mr. Alex Atamanenko: With respect to Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program entitlement, the appeals process and exclusion from entitlement to other federal agricultural programs: (a) are appellants entitled to know what recommendations are made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (b) are appellants entitled to know on what grounds the Intermediate Appeals Sub-Committee rejects recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (c) has the CAIS administration ever issued rejection letters to an appellant before ...[+++]or after soliciting the involvement of an appeals committee and, if so, how is a copy of the motion or other directive permitting this obtained by the appellant; (d) who is responsible for forwarding recommendations made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (e) are there any legitimate grounds upon which the National CAIS Committee (NCC) administration is allowed to refuse an appellant the full extent of an appeal by neglecting to forward the recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (f) does the appeal process deal with appeals on a case by case basis or can the NCC administration short-circuit the appeals process based on a judgment that an appellant's complaint is just like the one that may have preceded it; (g) are there guidelines established that would give an appellant a reasonable expectation of the time it should take to address an appeal at all the various levels and, if so, what are the guidelines that govern a reasonable expectation; (h) is the appellant justified in expecting that the decisions made by appeals committees will be communicated to the appellant; (i) what are the circumstances under which it would be accepta ...

The authorities in Trans-Dnistria ignored the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, as mentioned above, which acquitted Tudor Petrov Popa and Andrei Ivantoc three years ago.

Under that subsection, when the Chief of the Defence Staff determines that a person who is subject to the Code of Service Discipline is, for operational reasons, unable to: (1) apply for an exemption within the required period; (2) file an appeal, within the required period, concerning the legality of an order to comply with SOIRA, or file an appeal, within the required period, concerning a decision of the court to not grant an exemption or a decision of the court to not grant a termination; (3) participate in a proceeding relating to an exemption order or in an appeal; or (4) comply with the obligation to report to a registration office within the required period, the time limits ...[+++] that apply to the exercise of these rights or the exemption from the obligation to report to a registration office will be temporarily suspended until those operational obligations have ended.

4. If the Council of Members finds that a Member has committed a breach of this Agreement, it may either impose on that Member sanctions, ranging from a simple warning to the suspension of the Member’s right to participate in decisions of the Council of Members until it has met its obligations, or, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 45, exclude the Member from participation in the Agreement.