legislative review process

revision process

amending process [ process of amendment | amendment process ]

improve processes | improve business processes | manage processes

judicial review | proceeding for judicial review | review

aeroplane gas turbine engine maintenance technician | aviation gas turbine engine repair technician | aircraft gas turbine engine maintenance technician | aircraft gas turbine engine overhaul technician

Process on stability and good-neighbourliness in south-east Europe | Royaumont Process

implement data quality processes | verify data

Definition: Sexual dysfunction covers the various ways in which an individual is unable to participate in a sexual relationship as he or she would wish. Sexual response is a psychosomatic process and both psychological and somatic processes are usually involved in the causation of sexual dysfunction.

Critics claim that the current process of conviction review is secretive, as applicants are unaware of the review process.

The review process has now reached an advanced stage; the EDPS issued a comprehensive opinion on the legislative proposals on 7 March 2012, closely followed the review process and fulfilled his advisory role in the course of 2012 by intervening at the appropriate stages and in the appropriate fora.

6. Suggests that the European Parliament and national parliaments should use the new framework for cooperation established by the Lisbon Treaty and carry out annual reviews of the implementation process in a selected area of the single market; considers that the Commission and national authorities should do their utmost to take account of the outcomes of the review process;

(Return tabled) Question No. 68 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative (CHVI) and the Level 5 Laboratory (L5L): (a) what are the details of the initial request for proposals for the CHVI; (b) what amount were the government and the Gates Foundation planning to invest in the CHVI and what were the scheduled dates for investment; (c) how many bids for the CHVI were submitted and by which organizations; (d) what are the details of the CHVI process for determining suitable award winners; (e) what were the selection criteria for awarding the CHVI bid and who was responsible for identifying the criteria; (f ...[+++]) how many people made up the independent evaluation committee for the CHVI bids, how were they selected, and from which disciplines and geographic areas were they drawn; (g) were representatives from the pharmaceutical industry invited to be part of the independent evaluation committee for the CHVI bids and, if so, on what date did each representative serve and, if not, why not; (h) what were the results for each of the selection criterion for each of the organizations bidding on the CHVI and how were the bids ranked; (i) did the independent evaluation committee for the CHVI bids reach a recommendation, and, if so, on what date, and to whom was the information conveyed in the government; (j) was there a steering committee for the CHVI bids and, if so, who were the members, who was the chair and what was its mandate; (k) were there changes to the steering committee for the CHVI bids and, if so, on what dates and for what reasons; (l) was any organization bidding on the CHVI informed, formally or otherwise, that it had been chosen to host the facility and, if so, how and on what date; (m) did the federal government put up a notice on its Web site to announce that the CHVI project had been cancelled or would not proceed and, if so, on what date; (n) was the notice in (m) removed from the Web site and, if so, on what date and fo ...