improve the security and accessibility of the system by providing for uniform requirements for officers on the ground on how to process SIS data in a secure way and ensure business-continuity for end-users; strengthen data protection by introducing additional safeguards to ensure that the collection and processing of and access to data is limited to what is strictly necessary, in full respect of EU legislation and fundamental rights, including the right to effective remedies; improve information sharing and cooperation between Member States, notably through the introduction of a new alert category on "unknown wanted persons" and full access rights for Europol ; help combat terrorism ...[+++] by introducing the obligation to create a SIS alert in cases related to terrorist offences and a new 'inquiry check' to help authorities gather essential information; better protect children by allowing authorities to issue, in addition to alerts for missing children, preventive alerts for children who are at high risk of abduction; contribute to the effective enforcement of entry bans for third-country nationals at the external border by making their introduction in the SIS compulsory; improve the enforcement of return decisions issued to irregularly staying third-country nationals by introducing a new alert category for return decisions; make more effective use of data such as facial imaging and palm prints to identify persons entering the Schengen area; strengthen the support for prevention and investigation of theft and counterfeiting by providing for alerts to be issued on a wider range of stolen and falsified goods and documents.

(7) This Regulation should therefore complement the existing Union regulatory framework (Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[14], Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[15], Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[16], Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[17], Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[18], Commission Directive 2002/77/EC[19], as well as Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council[20], Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Co ...[+++]uncil[21] and Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament[22]) and the applicable national legislations adopted in conformity with Union law, by establishing specific rights and obligations for both electronic communications providers and end-users, by making consequential amendments to the existing Directives and to Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 in order to secure greater convergence as well as some substantive changes consistent with a more competitive Single Market.

(4) Subsection (3) does not apply in respect of ventilators in Position 1 with coamings that extend 3.8 m or more above the deck or to ventilators in Position 2 with coamings that extend 1.8 m or more above the deck.

For those of us in the Windsor-Detroit area who understand what a private monopoly looks like with the Ambassador Bridge, who have been arguing that a competitive bridge under public oversight would cut into revenues for them, if you do a comparison, their tolls are 35% higher than the bridge tolls at the Blue Water Bridge in Sarnia, and 42% higher than the Peace Bridge in Niagara.

[15] One country had a slightly higher figure but has not been included here because, in the absence of full data, it did not include all the channels concerned with an audience share of over 3% over the reference period.

[16] One country had a slightly higher figure but has not been included here because, in the absence of full data, it did not include all the channels concerned with an audience share of over 3% over the reference period.