Ordinance of 25 May 2011 on Narcotics Addition and other Addiction Disorders [ NarcAO ]

Ordinance of the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products of 9 November 2001 on the Licensing Requirements for Therapeutic Products | Therapeutic Products Licensing Requirements Ordinance [ TPLRO ]

Federal Assembly Ordinance of 18 March 1988 to the Parliamentary Resources Act [ ParlRO ]

If the member has not read it, I recommend it to him. Recommendation 4 requests that the government update the Criminal Code to add things that include data preservation demands and orders; new production orders to trace a specified communication, which I think was one of the things he mentioned; new warrants and production orders for transmission of data and tracking, which is another thing he mentioned; improving judicial oversight while enhancing efficiencies in relation to authorizations, warrants and orders, which is another thing he mentioned; and other amendments to existing offences and investigative powers that will assist i ...[+++]n the investigation of cyberbullying and other crimes that implicate electronic evidence.

On the issue of the use of languages, in the case that the judge makes orders with respect of the witnesses or in the context of bilingual trials, we believe and the case law certainly indicates this to be the case that the proper interpretation of the judge in the context of a subsection 530(1) order will always be to put the right of the accused, which is unchanged here, to a trial in his or her official language of choice at the forefront of the considerations that the judge will take into account.

Nevertheless, future prohibition advocates would view the 1907 “ten-year agreement” as the first successful opium “treaty”; for the next 60 years. This agreement was to set the tone for international drug control negotiations.[7] The stage was now set for the first in a long series of international conferences, treaties and conventions, as shown in the table below.[8]

- MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF THE VALIDITY OF MEDICAL PRESCRIPTIONS IN THE MEMBER STATES "THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Whereas, in its Resolution of 30 November 1995 on the integration of health protection requirements in Community policies, the Council considers that the Community must pay particular attention to the impact on health of action proposed in a number of areas, including free movement of goods; Whereas action to improve understanding of and address the impact on human health of the free movement of goods, in particular the free movement of medicinal products, should form part of the Community's overall strategy for action in the field of public health; Whereas ...[+++]the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured; Whereas patients, in moving from one Member State to another, could in practice be prevented from purchasing medicinal products prescribed by an authorized medical practitioner in another Member State; Whereas, pursuant to the Treaty and to Directive 93/16/EEC, all discriminatory treatment based on nationality with regard to establishment and provision of services is prohibited in medical practice; Whereas this Resolution does not affect provisions governing the financing or reimbursement of the cost of medicinal products by national social security schemes; Whereas, moreover, this Resolution does not cover prescriptions for a non-exempt dose of a substance classified as a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance under United Nations international conventions, CALLS on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and taking account of work in this area by the relevant international organizations, to look into the present position with regard to the mutual recognition of medical prescriptions in the Member States.