EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62014FJ0011 - EN - Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015. Bruno Dupré v European External Action Service. Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to A ...[+++]D 14 — Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post — Judgment by default. Case F-11/14.

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015.Bruno Dupré v European External Action Service.Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 — Principle of correspondence between th ...[+++]e grade and the post — Judgment by default.Case F-11/14.

Officials — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Grading — Correspondence between grade and post — Employment in a post formerly occupied by an official at a higher grade — Circumstance not precluding recruitment at a lower grade — Appointment of a member of staff of a Member State’s national diplomatic service as a member of the temporary staff — Taking into consideration of functions previously performed as a seconded national expert — Precluded

To help facilitate today's discussion, I will provide an overview of the budget increases and reductions along six major themes: Budgets for Members, House Officers and Presiding Officers; Security; Services to Members; Infrastructure; Salaries; and Committees and Parliamentary Associations.

The breakdown of expenditures for the next fiscal year includes $233,904,510 for expenses related to members and House officers, and $149,316,180 for House administration services.

However, in its report to both Houses of the British Parliament in 1999, the Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege provided a list of some types of contempt. Included in the list were the following: interrupting or disturbing the proceedings of, or engaging in other misconduct in the presence of, the House or a committee; assaulting, threatening, obstructing, or intimidating a member or officer of the House in the discharge of their duties; deliberately attempting to mislead the House or a committee by way of a statement, evidence, or petition; deliberately publishing a false or misleading report of the proceedings of the House o ...[+++]r a committee; without reasonable excuse, refusing to answer a question or provide information or produce papers formally required by the House or a committee; divulging or publishing the content of any report or evidence of a select committee before it has been reported to the House; or acting in breach of any order of the House.