standard error of average income

The new rules will include value sharing clauses to be negotiated by every product sector, and give farmers the right to ask for a written contract for the first time (unless trading with SMEs); Simpler risk management tools to help farmers, including a sector-specific income stabilisation tool and improvements to insurance schemes that will allow compensation of up to 70% for farmers whose production or income is cut by at least 20%; Clearer rules governing intervention in markets, allowing the Commission to act rapidly to address market failures without having to use public intervention or private storage measures; Greater flexibility for Member States to support specific sectors of economic, social or environmental importance through voluntary coupled ...[+++] support, even when these sectors are not in crisis; Clearer rules on support for farmers, notably through more flexibility on the definition of active farmers and stronger incentives for young farmers, with an increase in additional payments from 25% to 50% and guaranteeing all young farmers the right to the full five-year allowance for these payments, regardless of when they apply for them within their first five years of their setting-up; Improved environmental measures including simpler rules on crop diversification and the addition of three new types of ecological focus area focused on nitrogen-fixing crops, giving farmers and national authorities more options to suit their particular circumstances.

We could learn from our mistakes so that, unlike with the failed Lisbon Strategy, we would have a clear understanding of how we will achieve the objectives set, what kinds of financial resources we will be able to use, and whether our resources will enable us to achieve any of the objectives.

The classification as a carcinogen need not apply to fibres with a length weighted geometric mean diameter, less two standard errors, greater than 6μm’.

Given a $12 billion surplus for the fiscal year ending on March 31, and given an anticipated surplus of $20 billion for next year—not the surpluses as they appear in the budget documents where, once again, the finance minister's figures are zero and zero, but the real figures which the Bloc Quebecois makes a habit of providing and which are accurate to within 5%, which is normal, unlike the finance minister's figures, which are off by 150%—one would have expected middle income families to enjoy meaningful tax reductions. After all, these are the people who have had to pay most of the $19 billion in new taxes imposed by the Minister of Finance since 1994, not to mention the GST increase, which brought in $5 billion in ...[+++]revenues.