This capacity shall be reserved until the time limit before its scheduled time as decided by the management board.This time limit shall not exceed 30 days.

17. Emphasises that payments awarded to complainants should be compensatory and should not exceed the actual damage (damnum emergens) and losses ('lucrum cessans') suffered, in order to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the ability of the victim to mitigate the damage and losses may be taken into account; however in the case of cartels, suggeststhat first applicants cooperating with the competition authorities in leniency programmes should not be held jointly and severally liable with the other infringers, and that interest should be calculated from the date of the infringement;

17. Emphasises that payments awarded to complainants should be compensatory and should not exceed the actual damage (damnum emergens) and losses ('lucrum cessans') suffered, in order to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the ability of the victim to mitigate the damage and losses may be taken into account; however in the case of cartels, suggeststhat first applicants cooperating with the competition authorities in leniency programmes should not be held jointly and severally liable with the other infringers, and that interest should be calculated from the date of the infringement;

15. Emphasises that payments awarded to complainants should be compensatory and should not exceed the actual damage (damnum emergens) and losses ('lucrum cessans') suffered, in order to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the ability of the victim to mitigate the damage and losses may be taken into account; however in the case of cartels, suggests that it should be possible to award compensation of double the amount of damages on a discretionary basis, that first applicants cooperating with the competition authorities in leniency programmes should not be held jointly and severally liable with the other infringers, and that interest should be calculated from the date of the in ...[+++]fringement;

The Commission's monitoring report of the KWW yard of 30 June 1998 indicated that the yearly capacity ceiling would be considerably exceeded in 1998 and 1999.

In addition: - closure aid will be granted within the limits fixed in the second subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the Code (the amount of aid may not exceed the higher of the following two values: discounted rate of return on fixed assets over three years or the residual book value of the plants to be closed); - there will not be any increase in the remaining steel production capacity of any plant in the group to which the firm belongs for at least five years from the date of payment of the closure aid, with the exception of capacity ...[+++]increases due to improved productivity; - closed plant will be scrapped; - aid will be granted only for whole sites, and not for parts of sites; sites to be closed and sites remaining in operation must belong to separate legal entities and be managed independently.