(3) Where, on an application pursuant to subsection (2), the Tribunal or court is satisfied that sufficient evidence exists or may reasonably be obtained without detaining the thing that is the subject-matter of the proceedings, the Tribunal or court may order it to be returned to the applicant, subject to any condition the Tribunal or court may impose to ensure that it is preserved for any purpose for which it may subsequently be ...[+++]required.

Improve the coordination among all the services and authorities involved in the return process in each Member State by June 2017 to ensure that all skills and expertise required are available for effective returns while respecting the rights of the returnees; Remove inefficiencies by shortening deadlines for appeals, systematically issuing return decisions that do not have an expiry date and combining decisions on the ending of a legal stay with the issuance of a return decision to avoid duplicate work; Tackle abuses of the system by making use of the possibility to assess asylum claims in accelerated or, where considered appropriate, ...[+++]border procedures when it is suspected asylum claims are made merely to delay the enforcement of a return decision; Prevent absconding by detaining people who have received a return decision and who show signs they will not comply such as refusal to cooperate in the identification process or opposing a return operation violently or fraudulently; Increase the effectiveness of return procedures and decisions by only granting voluntary departure if necessary and if a request is made and giving the shortest possible periods for voluntary departure, taking into account individual circumstances; Set up operational assisted voluntary return programmes by 1 June 2017 and ensure proper dissemination of information on voluntary return and assisted voluntary return and reintegration programmes.

We feel if ample precedent for the waiving of capital gains exists, as it does in environmentally sensitive lands and in the case of movable cultural property, art and artifacts, there is every good reason that theoretically immovable cultural properties, such as heritage buildings, should be given similar treatment.

In addition, any extension of detention must be in writing, with reasons being given in fact and in law, and be subject to a review of legality by a court

or grant the third-country national concerned the right to take proceedings by means of which the lawfulness of detention shall be subject to a speedy judicial review to be decided on as speedily as possible after the launch of the relevant proceedings.

To protect the rights of the consumer, the supply of goods or services to a person is covered by special provisions, according to the principle of the protection of the weaker party.