The second line in the table is replaced by the following:

3.8 Although the regulation states the ODR platform will have the function of ‘enabling the parties and the ADR entity to conduct the dispute resolution procedure online’ (Article 5(3)(d)), the EESC had hoped that the foundations would be laid for an ODR system that would contribute to the legitimacy of online or electronic justice; it would hope that the system would be shaped in such a way as to re-use and copy existing infrastructure and technological resources, synchronous or asynchronous, such as chat, electronic forums ...[+++], mailing lists, email, tele-conferencing, audio- and video-conferencing, virtual meeting rooms etc.; that it would improve justice applications and advocate first- and second-generation ODR tools for the process (online negotiation, mediation and arbitration), promoting e-mediation between the parties, a more robust production process and more easily observable and predictable procedures.

It is “and contribute to averting..”. to the second-last line from the end of the paragraph.

2. By renumbering Standing Order 76 as Standing Order 76.1 and by amending the said Standing Order: (a) in section (1) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word ``committee'', the words ``after the bill has been read a second time''; (b) in section (2) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word ``stage'', the words ``of a bill that has been read a second time'' and by adding, at the end, the words, ``When the same amendment is put on notice by more than one Member, that notice shall be printed once, under the name of each Member who has submitted it'. '; (c) in section (3) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word ` ...[+++]`bill'', the words ``that has been read a second time''; (d) in section (5) thereof, by adding, immediately after the words ``upon it'', the words, ``If an amendment has been selected that has been submitted by more than one Member, the Speaker, after consultation, shall designate which Member shall propose it'.

By renumbering Standing Order 76 as Standing Order 76.1 and by amending the said Standing Order: (a) in section (1) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word “committee”, the words “after the bill has been read a second time”; (b) in section (2) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word “stage”, the words “of a bill that has been read a second time” and by adding, at the end, the words, “When the same amendment is put on notice by more than one Member, that notice shall be printed once, under the name of each Member who has submitted it” (c) in section (3) thereof, by inserting immediately after the word “bill”, the words ...[+++]“that has been read a second time”; (d) in section (5) thereof, by adding, immediately after the words “upon it”, the words, “If an amendment has been selected that has been submitted by more than one Member, the Speaker, after consultation, shall designate which Member shall propose it” (e) in section (6) thereof, by deleting the words “section (2) of”; (f) by deleting section (8) thereof and by substituting the following therefor:

In amendment, the Honourable Senator Comeau moved, seconded by the Honourable Senator Nolin, that the report be amended in the French version by replacing, in the second line of the paragraph beginning with the words " Que le Sénat insiste sur l'amendement 2'', the word " reconnaît'' with the words " faut reconnaître'' and by replacing, in the same paragraph on the fifth line, the words " mais qu'elles sont plutôt'' by the words " qui sont en fait''.