John Tracy Clinic Correspondance Course

Mr. John Cummins (Delta—South Richmond, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, the priority native commercial fishery mandated by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Marshall decision reflects precisely the separate native commercial fishery imposed on British Columbia fishermen by the previous Conservative government.

Mr. Jason Kenney: Madam Speaker, one of the reasons it is a pleasure for me to rise to debate Bill S-14 is that it is in part reflective of a private member's bill I had in this place in the last parliament which would have formally recognized the birthday of our first great prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald.

Question No. 484 Hon. John McKay: With regard to the three project profiles located on the Canadian International Development Agency’s (CIDA) webpage, one for each of Colombia, Peru and Bolivia, entitled “Promoting Effective Corporate Social Responsibility”, for a total of twenty million dollars: (a) what are the executing agency and partners for each of the projects; (b) how much funding has been allocated for each project, (i) how much of the allocated funding has been spent, (ii) when was funding for each project first spent, (iii) what specific activities and expenses has the funding been spent on, (iv) in what specific are ...[+++]a of each country has this funding been spent; (c) are there Canadian or other mining projects in these areas; and (d) do these three projects correspond to CIDA’s Andean Regional Initiative?

That is inconsistent with the ruling in the Law case; the final decision, however, will probably be made by the Supreme Court justices (1025) [English] Mr. John McKay: Madame Ouellet, surely you appreciate that all rights are not absolute.