Technical and Drafting Committee

technical committee (EU) [ EC technical committee ]

Technical Drafting Committee

Technical Committee on Customs Valuation

European Fluorocarbon Technical Committee | EFCTC [Abbr.]

International Committee for the Preparation of a History of the Cinema

competition technical committee

draft editorial board | make editorial board | create editorial board | write editorial board

Scientific and Technical Research Committee [ CREST ]

In doing so, the amendment also supports the political objective of ensuring clarity of tasks between the Commission, EASA and the Eurocontrol organisation so that , the Commission focuses on economic and technical regulation, with EASA acting as its agent on technical regulation drafting and oversight, while Eurocontrol will focus on operational tasks, in particular built around the Network Manager concept[5].

(3e) This Regulation aims to fulfil the requirement laid down in Article 65a of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 by removing the overlaps between Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, adapting the former to the latter and ensuring a clear allocation of tasks between the Commission, the Agency and Eurocontrol, so that the Commission focuses on economic and technical regulation, the Agency acts as its agent on technical regulation drafting and oversight, and Eurocontrol focuses on operational tasks, in particular those relating to the netw ...[+++]ork manager concept pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 550/2004, in which a common en route charging scheme for air navigation services, including oversight, was established to achieve greater transparency and cost-efficiency for the benefit of airspace users.

28. Calls on the Commission to propose a better SEPA governance, covering the organisational setup related to the development of the main features of payment services and of the implementation of the requirements which need to be met, and allowing the development of technical and security standards to be organised separately in support of the implementation of the related legislation; calls for a more balanced representation of all stakeholders in the further development of common technical and security standards for payment schemes; urges the Commission to answer its previous calls for reform of SEPA governance so as to ensure better ...[+++]representation of payment services users in the decision-making and standard-setting process; notes that these stakeholders ay include – but are not necessarily restricted to – the EPC, consumer organisations, merchant organisations and large retail chains, the European Banking Authority (EBA), the Commission, experts in various fields, non-banking payment service providers, and mobile, internet and card commerce and mobile network operators; calls on these stakeholders to arrange their work under a new governance structure where the SEPA Council has a role; considers that the SEPA Council should be assisted by various technical committees, or ‘task forces’ for e-payment, m-payment, cards, cash and other standardisation issues, and by ad hoc working groups; recalls the Commission's commitment, in the declaration on SEPA governance on the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 260/2012, to come up with proposal before the end of 2012; calls on European standardisation bodies such as the European Committee for Standardisation (Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), in cooperation with the Commission, to play a more active role in standardising card payments;

28. Calls on the Commission to propose a better SEPA governance, covering the organisational setup related to the development of the main features of payment services and of the implementation of the requirements which need to be met, and allowing the development of technical and security standards to be organised separately in support of the implementation of the related legislation; calls for a more balanced representation of all stakeholders in the further development of common technical and security standards for payment schemes; urges the Commission to answer its previous calls for reform of SEPA governance so as to ensure better ...[+++]representation of payment services users in the decision-making and standard-setting process; notes that these stakeholders ay include – but are not necessarily restricted to – the EPC, consumer organisations, merchant organisations and large retail chains, the European Banking Authority (EBA), the Commission, experts in various fields, non-banking payment service providers, and mobile, internet and card commerce and mobile network operators; calls on these stakeholders to arrange their work under a new governance structure where the SEPA Council has a role; considers that the SEPA Council should be assisted by various technical committees, or ‘task forces’ for e-payment, m-payment, cards, cash and other standardisation issues, and by ad hoc working groups; recalls the Commission's commitment, in the declaration on SEPA governance on the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 260/2012, to come up with proposal before the end of 2012; calls on European standardisation bodies such as the European Committee for Standardisation (Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), in cooperation with the Commission, to play a more active role in standardising card payments;