door-to-door delivery van | home delivery van

door-to-door delivery

door-to-door selling [ door-to-door | door-to-door retailing | door-to-door canvassing ]

curbside recycling [ curbside recycling collection | recycling collection | selective door-to-door collection ]

door-to-door distribution | house-to-house distribution | door-to-door

door-to-door selling | house-to-house selling | door-to-door canvassing | house-to-house canvassing | door to door sale | door-to-door

door-to-door collection

curbside collection [ curb collection | door-to-door collection | curb pick-up and return | curb pickup and return ]

door-to-door collection

Carriage and insurance paid to | CIP

7. Welcomes the very late decision by the French President Hollande to suspend the export of the first Mistral class helicopter carrier in November 2014 due to the Russian aggression of Ukraine, but calls on France to definitively revoke this contract; recalls that Russia intends to name the second Mistral class battleship after the Russian-occupied Ukrainian sea port ‘Sebastopol’; urges the United Kingdom to immediately withdraw all current arms exports licences to Russia and equally urges the Member States to reinforce the EU arms embargo on Russia by not only banning future export ...[+++]s but all current contracts and licences;

‘integrator’ means an undertaking offering a door-to-door contractually governed freight transport service, guaranteeing the transportation of freight and/or mail from origin to final destination and seamlessly integrating transportation, groundhandling, consignment sorting and delivery services;

13. Considers that the Regulation should contain a new provision dealing with the opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties; takes the view that such provision could provide that a person who is not a party to the contract will be bound by an exclusive choice-of-court agreement concluded in accordance with the Regulation only if: (a) that agreement is contained in a written document or electronic record; (b) that person is given timely and adequate notice of the court where the action is to be brought; (c) in contracts for carriage of goods, the chosen court is (i) the domicile of the carrier; (ii) the place of ...[+++] receipt agreed in the contract of carriage; (iii) the place of delivery agreed in the contract of carriage, or (iv) the port where the goods are initially loaded on a ship or the port where the goods are finally discharged from a ship; considers that it should further be provided that, in all other cases, the third party may bring an action before the court otherwise competent under the Regulation if it appears that holding that party to the chosen forum would be blatantly unfair;

13. Considers that the Regulation should contain a new provision dealing with the opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties; takes the view that such provision could provide that a person who is not a party to the contract will be bound by an exclusive choice-of-court agreement concluded in accordance with the Regulation only if: (a) that agreement is contained in a written document or electronic record; (b) that person is given timely and adequate notice of the court where the action is to be brought; (c) in contracts for carriage of goods, the chosen court is (i) the domicile of the carrier; (ii) the place of ...[+++] receipt agreed in the contract of carriage; (iii) the place of delivery agreed in the contract of carriage, or (iv) the port where the goods are initially loaded on a ship or the port where the goods are finally discharged from a ship; considers that it should further be provided that, in all other cases, the third party may bring an action before the court otherwise competent under the Regulation if it appears that holding that party to the chosen forum would be blatantly unfair;