judicial cooperation [ mutual assistance in legal matters | judicial assistance(GEMET) ]

crime reporter | forensic journalist | crime and defence correspondent | crime journalist

judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU [ European Judicial Network in criminal matters | judicial cooperation in criminal matters | mutual assistance in criminal matters ]

judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU [ European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters ]

detention officer | youth detention worker | juvenile correctional officer | young offenders detention officer

court administration officer | court registrar | court administrative officer | tribunal administrative officer

detrimental reliance constructive trust

It happened in Rosenberg, the very case relied upon by Honourable Minister Marcel Massé in an attempt to create a legal basis for the very definition that is key to the bill that is before you this evening.

Strengthening the organisational and administrative capacity of the judicial system (Courts, prosecutor’s offices and main central bodies of the judiciary: Ministry of Justice, High Court of Cassation and Justice, Public Ministry, National Anticorruption Directorate and Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism) and developing the human resources; improving access and quality of justice while ensuring transparency and integrity within the judiciary (based mainly on the implementation of the National Anti- Corruption ...[+++] Strategy and the complementary measures in this area); Improved land registration services - integration of existing data and scaling up systematic registration in rural areas.

25. Reaffirms the importance of opening Chapters 23 (judiciary and fundamental rights) and 24 (justice and home affairs) early in the negotiation process and closing them at the end; stresses that this would be consistent with the Commission’s new approach for new candidate countries; recalls that the opening of these chapters is based on the fulfilment of the conditions defined in the official benchmarks and stresses, therefore, that delivering to Turkey the official benchmarks for the opening of Chapters 23 and 24 would provide a ...[+++]clear roadmap for, and give a boost to, the reform process and, in particular, would provide a clear anchor for the reform process in Turkey, on the basis of European standards, with particular reference to the judiciary; calls on the Council, therefore, to make renewed efforts for the delivery of the official benchmarks and ultimately, upon fulfilment of the criteria set, for the opening of Chapters 23 and 24; calls on Turkey to cooperate as much as possible to this end; calls on the Commission to promote without delay further dialogue and cooperation with Turkey in the fields of the judiciary and fundamental rights and of justice and home affairs in the framework of the Positive Agenda;

(Return tabled) Question No. 1306 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the crisis in Syria: (a) what criteria does the government use to determine (i) whether to intervene, (ii) when to intervene, (iii) the nature and scope of any intervention; (b) who makes the determination in (a) and how; (c) what sources does the government rely upon in determining (a); (d) what legal obligations are considered with respect to (a) and in what ways does the Responsibility to Protect doctrine factor into decision making under (a); (e) in what ways has the government evaluated its obligations under the Responsibility to Protect doctrine with respect to Syria; (f) when were such evaluations done, by whom, and with what outcome; (g) ...[+++]have the criteria by which the government determines its official policy towards the crisis in Syria changed since 2012; (h) when the Minister of Foreign Affairs publicly expressed his support for an indictment of Bashar al-Assad by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2012, was this the position of the government and does it remain the position of the government that al-Assad ought to be indicted by the ICC; (j) with respect to Canada’s decision not to sign on to the request of 57 countries made in January, 2013, to ask the Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC, did Canada support this request; (k) with respect to (j), when, why, how, and by whom were the determinations made in this regard, and when was Canada approached to join in this endeavor and by what means; (l) what criteria were applied in determining whether to support this effort; (m) are there any specific policies or directives within the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade that guide decision-making with regard to Canadian intervention in situations of humanitarian crisis; (n) was the decision not to sign the Swiss-led letter asking the United Nations Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC made by the Minister of Fore ...