charges for use of infrastructure [ airport charge | airport due | airport fee | airport tax | dock due | embarkation tax | harbor due | harbor fee | harbour due | harbour fee | port charge | port due | port tax ]

anchorage dues | berthage

table of fees

fee schedule [ ATI fee schedule ]

tariff schedule

dock and harbour dues

Thirdly, whilst some Member States have implemented the Directive fully and are making considerable efforts to facilitate patients’ rights to cross-border healthcare, there are a considerable number of Member States where the obstacles placed in the way of patients by health systems are significant, and which, in some cases at least, appear to be the result of intentional political choices: some of the current systems of prior authorisation are more extensive than the current numbers of requests would appear to justify; in many cases it is not clear exactly which treatments require prior authorisation; lower reimbursement tariffs than ...[+++]those used in the home Member State are a clear disincentive; there are a number of burdensome administrative requirements which may well deter patients.

The least competitive producers would be encouraged to sell their planting rights swiftly, since the grubbing-up premium would be set at an attractive level for the first year and a decreasing scale would be set for following years.

The fees or charges may include a scale of fixed charges based on average costs for the work referred to in paragraph 1.

The main aim of the Commission proposal was to review existing legislation on Port State control, with a view to clarification or reinforcement of its provisions and to ensure a more effective application of the system of control in ports and anchorages in the European Union. The Commission proposal also added a number of provisions, in areas which were not covered by port State control, such as maritime safety, in order to take account of recent developments in international and Community law.