A change to tariff item No. 8528. 12.95 from tariff item No. 8528. 12.10 or any other heading, except from tariff item No. 8540. 12.91 or 8540.12.99 or more than one of the following :

8. Takes the view, however, that a tariff-only free trade agreement would not be ambitious enough given that the largest economic gains are to be had in reducing the level of non-tariff barriers; supports the goal proposed by the HLWG of eliminating all duties on bilateral trade, with the objective of achieving a substantial elimination of tariffs upon entry into force of the agreement and a phasing out of all but the most sensitive tariffs in short time-frame, which could deliver significant gains, considering that EU-US bilateral trade to a large extent consists of intra-firm trade, and enhance the global competitiveness of the EU and US companies on ...[+++]the world stage;

It is true that ‘motorised scooters’ are classified as ‘vehicles for transport’ under tariff number EU 8703 10 18, to which 10% duty is applied.

8. Takes the view that tariff protection is reasonable and should continue to be an important and legitimate instrument enabling the authorities to regulate imports; points out that erga omnes tariff protection is the key aspect of the preferences granted by the EU to certain countries, in particular developing countries; points out that abolishing that protection would deprive countries benefiting from preferences of all the advantages they currently have; also points out that this tariff protection is adjustable, which is useful, ...[+++] and can be suspended by the EU where commodity production in the Community is insufficient for properly supplying its processing industry;

8. Takes the view that reasonable tariff protection is and should continue to be an important and legitimate instrument enabling the authorities to regulate imports; points out that erga omnes tariff protection is the key aspect of the preferences granted by the EU to certain countries, in particular developing countries; points out that abolishing that protection would deprive countries benefiting from preferences of all the advantages they currently have; also points out that this tariff protection is adjustable, which is useful, ...[+++] and can be suspended by the EU where commodity production in the Community is insufficient for properly supplying its processing industry;

(9) It should be determined when an unfair pricing practice shall be deemed to exist; an examination of the pricing practices of a third-country air carrier should be restricted to those limited number of cases where the air carrier is benefiting from a non-commercial advantage which cannot be clearly identified as a subsidy.