grant benefits | award benefits | allow benefits

The Persistence of Unemployment: How Important Were Regional Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits?

attributable risk percent

attributable fraction

attributable risk

administer tourism services allotment | manage tourism services' allocation | coordinate tourism resource allocation | manage allocation of tourism services

attributable risk | risk difference | Excess risk

income available to common shareholders | income available to common stockholders | income available to ordinary shareholders

5. With regard to the Disability Basic Pension and other benefits, the amount of which is a fixed sum granted regardless of the period of coverage, if the requirements for receiving such benefits are fulfilled by virtue of subparagraph 1(a) or 3(a) of this Article, the amount to be granted shall be calculated according to the proportion of the sum of the periods of contribution and the premium-exempted periods under the pension system from which such benefits will be paid to the theoretical period of coverage referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article.

9. With regard to the Additional Pension for Spouses which is included in the Old-age Employees’ Pension and any other benefits that may be granted as a fixed sum in cases where the period of coverage under the Japanese pension systems for employees equals or exceeds the specified period determined by the legislation of Japan, if the requirements for receiving such benefits are fulfilled by virtue of subparagraph 1(a) of this Article, the amount to be granted shall be calculated according to the proportion of the periods of coverage under the Japanese pension systems for employees from which such benefits will be paid to that specified p ...[+++]eriod.

Several petitions were received by UK citizens resident in another EU country concerning the refusal by the UK Government to grant them benefits such as Disability Living Allowance, Attendance Allowance or Carer’s Allowance, despite the fact that the Court of Justice of the European Union had classified them as exportable sickness benefits in cash.

26. Is concerned at the fact that many petitioners were required by the UK authorities to undergo the ‘Right to Reside Test’ in order to gain access to social housing or other benefits, such as the jobseeker's allowance ; draws particular attention to the fact that this requirement introduces indirect discrimination on the grounds of nationality, contravening Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004; urges the United Kingdom to bring its legislation into line with EU law;