I have recommended and list to you seven points: one, legislation in place that protects the disbursal of parental assets to natural children; two, legislation that protects the right of access of natural children to a parent; three, legislation that protects the right of the natural child to direct access to medical records of their blood parent and access to related family documents, including step-parental documents, that is, marriage certificates or birth certificates; four, legislation that provides a model for wills and estates that respects human rights in the document terminology, legislation that protects the rights of family ...[+++] and kin in the area of protocol and powers traditionally spelled out in Christian principle: the right to disclosure of an impending death, the right to see a parent's body, the right to access to a parent's body after death, in terms of grave, ashes, a location; five, legislation that requires the will-writer and executor to serve overarching democratic rights and values, which include the rights of the child and the responsibility of the parent, and so on, in wills and estates; six, legislation that limits the archaic overarching individual powers of will-writers and executors, within democratic values and rights, with legal processes in place that provide recourse and accountability through the law; and seven, legislation that allows protection to parental assets in divorce agreements if no other protections are extended.

5. Where a CCP deposits assets with a third party, it shall ensure that the assets belonging to the clearing members are identifiable separately from the assets belonging to the CCP and from assets belonging to that third party by means of differently titled accounts on the books of the third party or any other equivalent measures that achieve the same level of protection.

Where the use of military assets and capabilities is considered to be appropriate, cooperation with the military will follow the modalities, procedures and criteria established by the Council or its competent bodies for making available to the Mechanism military assets and capabilities relevant to the protection of civilian populations.

The federal government has the responsibility to protect the asset and protect the people who use the asset.

The use of civil protection resources and military assets in response to humanitarian situations must be in line with the Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets in complex emergencies and the Oslo Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets in International Disaster Relief , in particular to safeguard compliance with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, humanity, impartiality and independence.

Bill S-24 states that a Canadian who has assets abroad should have the same protection as if those assets were in Canada; that they should have the protection of the court, in the sense that the court will have to assess the evidence put before it to justify that search.