assess performances | judge the performances | judge performances | judging performances

interim injunction judge | judge hearing applications for interim relief | judge hearing applications for provisional relief | judge hearing interim injunction proceedings | judge hearing the application for interim relief | judge in interlocutory proceedings | summary trial judge

challenge [ challenge to a judge | challenge to a juror | challenge to a lay magistrate | challenge to an arbitrator | challenge to a referee | challenge to a witness | challenge to evidence | challenge to jurors | challenge to testimony | jury challenge | recusal of a judge | recusation of a judge ]

deputy judge [ replacement judge | ad hoc judge | judge ad hoc | person who acts as a judge ]

Judge acting as Rapporteur | Judge who acts as Rapporteur | Judge-Rapporteur

judge's decision | judge's order | judge's ruling

assess performance of railroad operations | conduct performance assessments of rail operations | assess performance of rail operations | perform rail operations performance evaluations

aid magistrate | support magistrate | aid judge | assist judge

programme budgeting [ ABB | activity-based budgeting | BFOR | budget focused on results | PBB | performance-based budgeting | performance budgeting | planning, programming and budgeting system | PPBS | rationalisation of budget choices | RBB | result-based budgeting ]

regulatory policy [ better lawmaking | better law-making | better regulation | good regulatory practice | outcome-based regulation | performance-based regulation | REFIT | regulatory fitness | Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme | regulatory governance | regulatory improvement | regulatory quality | regulatory reform | smart regulation ]

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of these candidates to perform the duties of Judges or Advocates-General of the Court of Justice,

25. Notes that ADR mechanisms often depend on the trader's willingness to cooperate, and believes that the availability of an effective judicial redress system would act as a strong incentive for parties to agree an out-of-court settlement, which is likely to avoid a considerable amount of litigation; encourages the setting-up of ADR schemes at European level so as to allow fast and cheap settlement of disputes as a more attractive option than court proceedings, and suggests that judges performing the preliminary admissibility check for a collective action should also have the power to order the parties involved to first seek a collecti ...[+++]ve consensual resolution of the claim before launching collective court proceedings; believes that the criteria developed by the Court should be the starting point for the establishment of this power; stresses, however, that these mechanisms should remain, as the name indicates, merely an alternative to judicial redress, not a precondition therefor;

3. During a procedure to appoint one or more of the 12 additional Judges, the panel referred to in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall give an opinion on nominees' suitability to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court.

In that event, the European Parliament and the Council shall lay down the conditions under which the temporary Judges shall be appointed, their rights and duties, the detailed rules governing the performance of their duties and the circumstances in which they shall cease to perform those duties’.