211. Every one who knowingly takes, transports, directs, or offers to take, transport or direct, any other person to a common bawdy-house is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Serious damage was caused to residential homes, businesses and the agriculture industry, while there was severe disruption of major and local transport links and essential public infrastructure networks.

If you're getting the information for transportation security, fine, but if you're getting information for transportation security, go back to that list: “keeping a common bawdy house” how is it going to deal with airline or transportation security if there's an outstanding warrant on that?

There are many reasons for this, such as the decentralisation of urban land uses, the demand for bigger houses and out-of-town developments (like supermarkets and leisure centres), and the provision of transport infrastructure.

Here are a couple of examples: levelling the playing field between public and private transit by providing stable funding for public transit; enhancing energy efficiency in Canadian cities by, for instance, offering a GST rebate on renovations to existing homes if they improve energy efficiency; providing incentives to encourage the sustainable growth of our cities by, for instance, establishing sustainability criteria as the federal government moves to bring in more infrastructure programs; and furthermore, having the federal government get its own house in order by, for example, greening its extensive procurement regimes, in the sen ...[+++]se that it is the largest single procurer of goods and services in Canada.

Is it the individual who has left his or her car at home and taken public transit, or is it the transit system that is moving more people more efficiently?